|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Agree. Better to have A'mad in charge.Reader comment on item: Assessing the Iranian Election Submitted by Manuel Matamoros (United States), Jun 15, 2009 at 13:55 I agree 110% with Dr. Pipes. With Mousavi in charge it could be argued that there is something to negotiate about with Iran, all-the-while they build the nukes, and the West does nothing to stop them. Both will build the nukes. Only A'mad will tell you to your face, and Mousavi would comfort you with lies. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||