69 million page views

The Decision in Dismantling Settlements in Gaza

Reader comment on item: Sharon Loses His Way On Israeli 'Settlements'

Submitted by Shimon Z. Klein (Israel), Feb 14, 2004 at 04:55

There are many points in this article that are axiomatic and I have no argument with them. It is true that the settlements are not really the major issue that is a problem for attaining peace with the Palestinians. The main problem between Israel and the Palestinians is basically existential. The existential problem began the day that Israel was established in 1948. It would be a good idea to read Prof. Moshe Sharon's Article "Agenda for Islam – A War between Civilizations" as well as the "Hamas Manifesto" which illustrates this point very well. Today it is Hamas and their terrorist allied organizations that are ruling the Palestinian areas. The Palestinian Authority, with its leader Yasser Arafat holed up in the Muqata in Ramalla, is impotent and corrupt. It has outlived its relevancy in the Middle East.

http://www.freeman.org/m_online/feb04/sharon.htm

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/hamas.htm

All the wars that Israel had fought in the past were wars that were foisted onto her by the neighbouring Arab states. The whole of Israel was considered anathema to her Arab neighbours. The so called "occupation" phenomenon only occurred as a result of Israel's victory after the Six Day War in June 1967. What happened prior to that? Israel never had occupied territories and still there was this driving desire to destroy her. I hate to think what would have happened had Israel lost her wars of survival.

Having said all this, it is still desirable to vacate Gaza for security reasons. The safety of Israel's soldiers should not be compromised in defending settlements in close proximity to a hostile Palestinian population. Another problem is the settlers who are compromising their safety and the safety of their children in the areas near Gaza. The extra security burden that Israel has to face as well as the logistics problems involved getting to the settlements is a tremendous expense on Israel's limited budgetary resources as well as that of the taxpayer who has to foot the bill.

It would be more cost effective if Israel were to withdraw to defensible borders more or less along the green line with adjustments and resettle the settlers in the Negev area. The cost in lives would be avoided. The separation fence on defensible borders should be completed it should not be a point of argument of international proportions. Israel has the right to defend her citizens in the way that she sees appropriate.

Peace between Israel and the Palestinians will remain a dream for many years to come. The most that could be achieved would be some kind of "hudna" between Israel and the Palestinians and, as Prof. Sharon has pointed out in his article, a temporary peace settlement until the Moslems gain the strength to push the non-Moslem infidel (the Jews) into the sea. The fact that Israel exists on "Moslem (Arab) lands" will never be acceptable and this will drive an agreement even further from reality.

The U.S. has a similar problem in Iraq. Their rule – albeit temporary – is not acceptable in Iraq either. The suicide attacks against American soldiers will not cease until they (the infidel in Moslem eyes) will leave Iraqi soil.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (21) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Thank you [106 words]Denice Gary-PandolAug 12, 2009 15:48160119
peace [67 words]david pedersenJul 27, 2004 21:5316132
Love your comment! [50 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Melvin A. FechterJul 11, 2004 23:4815947
The Cost of security? [148 words]ManfredFeb 23, 2004 19:2913974
Jews in Gaza [140 words]Yuval BrandstetterFeb 21, 2004 05:0613959
1Will the PA keep a promise? [572 words]Ben ShniperFeb 19, 2004 10:4913936
Good points but dangerous? [129 words]Jacob FisherFeb 18, 2004 07:0613919
Israel's mistakes [65 words]Travis CarrFeb 17, 2004 21:3113914
The Decision in Dismantling Settlements in Gaza [518 words]Shimon Z. KleinFeb 14, 2004 04:5513877
One more reason for withdrawal [108 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Boris FrenkelFeb 12, 2004 21:1013863
Support of Daniel Pipes [26 words]Carl CohenFeb 12, 2004 12:0813858
A Tactical Withdrawal in Gaza [573 words]Uzi Amit-KohnFeb 12, 2004 07:4913857
The Pullback May Outflank the PA [758 words]Jonathan PfefferFeb 11, 2004 23:0613851
Take some give some. [254 words]R. KonopsFeb 11, 2004 17:2213847
Palestinian [38 words]George WeinbaumFeb 11, 2004 04:5713839
What a pity! [55 words]Yaron BrenmanFeb 10, 2004 19:3413833
I was wondering if anyone could comment... [50 words]David IseckeFeb 10, 2004 18:2313830
Hooray! A Bold Stance and Well Reasoned Arguments [54 words]Marj LewisFeb 10, 2004 17:3813829
Acceptable solution to Islam? [266 words]Darwin BarrettFeb 10, 2004 13:5413827
Right As Usual (EOM) [1 words]Dan AdlerFeb 10, 2004 13:5413826
Agree completely [85 words]Rich McMahonFeb 10, 2004 13:1613825

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)