33 readers online now

98,675 comments by 26,222 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Acceptable solution to Islam?
Reader comment on item: Sharon Loses His Way On Israeli 'Settlements'

Submitted by Darwin Barrett (United States), Feb 10, 2004 at 13:54

I believe you are 100% right. Giving in would only encourage them because they would indeed view that as a weakness. All Ego driven societies view that as a weakness. Their goal is now and always has been Muslim dominance. Maybe if we all convert to Islam, that would solve the conflicts in the Middle East. Right? Well, maybe not. Muslim on Muslim violence is very high also. So Maybe we should all convert to one specific type of Islam. That would solve the problem, right? Well, maybe not. Tribe vs Tribe and Clan vs Clan violence is very high also. So what is the Solution? There is only one solution and it isn't going to happen.

Man was given the key to the Kingdom and chose to ignore it. In psychological terms, the Ego is the problem. Not just individual Ego, but the Ego of the Tribe, Clan, nation, and any other Group. The Ego drives us apart and is the key to conflict. Wide is the Gate and Broad is the way that leads to destruction. This "Gate and Way" is the Ego, the path most humans take because they fail to choose the "Narrow" path and the straight way which is to align oneself with the Universal Creative force within that leads to harmony. This applies to the vast majority of humans who have populated the earth since this iteration of humanity began. The liklihood of changing the direction of civilization is slim.

In the Bible if you substitute Ego for Satan it will all make sense.

Read Matthew 5,6,7 "the Sermon on the Mount"

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (21) on this item

Title By Date
Thank you [106 words]Denice Gary-PandolAug 12, 2009 15:48
peace [67 words]david pedersenJul 27, 2004 21:53
Love your comment!
[w/response] [50 words]
Melvin A. FechterJul 11, 2004 23:48
The Cost of security? [148 words]ManfredFeb 23, 2004 19:29
Jews in Gaza [140 words]Yuval BrandstetterFeb 21, 2004 05:06
Will the PA keep a promise? [572 words]Ben ShniperFeb 19, 2004 10:49
Good points but dangerous? [129 words]Jacob FisherFeb 18, 2004 07:06
Israel's mistakes [65 words]Travis CarrFeb 17, 2004 21:31
The Decision in Dismantling Settlements in Gaza [518 words]Shimon Z. KleinFeb 14, 2004 04:55
One more reason for withdrawal
[w/response] [108 words]
Boris FrenkelFeb 12, 2004 21:10
Support of Daniel Pipes [26 words]Carl CohenFeb 12, 2004 12:08
A Tactical Withdrawal in Gaza [573 words]Uzi Amit-KohnFeb 12, 2004 07:49
The Pullback May Outflank the PA [758 words]Jonathan PfefferFeb 11, 2004 23:06
Take some give some. [254 words]R. KonopsFeb 11, 2004 17:22
Palestinian [38 words]George WeinbaumFeb 11, 2004 04:57
What a pity! [55 words]Yaron BrenmanFeb 10, 2004 19:34
I was wondering if anyone could comment... [50 words]David IseckeFeb 10, 2004 18:23
Hooray! A Bold Stance and Well Reasoned Arguments [54 words]Marj LewisFeb 10, 2004 17:38
⇒ Acceptable solution to Islam? [266 words]Darwin BarrettFeb 10, 2004 13:54
Right As Usual (EOM) [1 words]Dan AdlerFeb 10, 2004 13:54
Agree completely [85 words]Rich McMahonFeb 10, 2004 13:16

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.