Bush on the wrong side of the "War on Terror"
Reader comment on item: What's Wrong With Annapolis

Submitted by DrRJP (United States), Nov 28, 2007 at 19:24

On November 6, 2001, President George W. Bush told the world that "You're either with us or against us in the fight against terror." Now, six years later, the Annapolis Conference is proof positive that Bush is on the "against us" side. With statements like "...confront terrorism and incitement, whether committed by Palestinians or Israelis," Bush is more than clueless: he's chosen to side with the Devil.

There are no differences between the radical Islamic beliefs and tactics of Al Qaida and Hamas. There are no differences between their terrorist modus operandi and their desire to destroy the United States and Israel. There are also no real differences between Hamas and its "rival" Fatah in their desire to occupy the entire state of Israel by any means possible. By pushing for this conference and for Israel to abandon its own land to terrorists, Bush is aiding and abetting the other side in the "War on Terror." By carving up Israel and handing it to the Palestinians, Bush is not only rewarding terrorists and condoning terrorism, he is also validating their insane and nonsensical claims of a nonexistent Palestinian homeland.

Yesterday at Annapolis, Bush annouced that "Israel will agree to end its occupation of the land it acquired in 1967." Clearly, he has bought into the Big Lie and won't even blink as Jerusalem is handed over to a bunch of blood-thirsty, Arab nomads. A real Christian would never do that. By forcing this plan on Israel, Bush is signing the death warrants of every Jew and Christian who lives there, and is ushering in a new wave of terror that will ultimately make our country a more dangerous place in which to live.

Instead of people being so focused on who to put in the White House in 2008, they need to direct their attention to the current tenant, and let him know that his remaining tenure there is not a done deal. Bush should have learned from the debacle of the Damp David accords, and since he has not, Bush is now a worse enemy to Israel than Clinton ever was. When it comes to sucking up to the Saudis and allowing them to spread the radical Islamic virus, nobody does it better than Bush.

The 2000 intifada was the Palestinian's response to Clinton's generous peace plan, and one can only wonder what those "poor refuges" will do now given our President's blood sacrifice.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.