Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Ah, my dear, Ahmadiyya
Reader comment on item: Permit Muslim-only Enclaves?
in response to reader comment: Sratch the veneer

Submitted by Archimedes2 (Canada), Oct 10, 2007 at 22:33

Thanks for your input, Kamal. I don't claim any great expertise on the Ahmadiyya by any shot, but what I do know suggests pretty strongly that they have given up violence. Much of what you wrote about them (and what I wrote about them being severely persecuted in Dar al Islam) is true also for the Baha'i faith, which also considers itself to be superior to all other faiths ... but says so in a very patronizing, but gentle and tolerant way.

I can live with the patronizing aspect of Baha'i; they are no threat to me, and I have confidence that Baha'is intend only peace. As a Christian myself I'm happy to have collegial dialogue and debate till the cows come home (or the Lord ... or perhaps Mahdi :-) ... returns) with people of any religious background. What I cannot tolerate is groups that intend to use force or coercion (political, psychological, behavioral or military) to circumvent normal dialogue and free exchange of ideas.

If you have evidence that the Ahmadiyya are arming for military conflict, or gearing up to institute their version of Sharia in the west, etc. Then I'd be interested in hearing it. But from what I've seen they are the most outspoken opponents of the baser elements of islam. I'm quite willing to scratch the veneer if you'd be specific enough to show me where to begin scratching.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (17) on this item

Title By Date
What happened to Gwynnoaks Muslim Residential Development effort [17 words]SusyNov 13, 2009 11:37
Ignorance still rules [88 words]DavePFeb 25, 2009 18:50
May we be spared [225 words]Rebecca MouldsDec 23, 2008 18:22
God help us all [327 words]DavePFeb 25, 2009 18:32
I am outraged [1501 words]Tess McNamaraDec 22, 2008 03:56
Islamic Foot In Mouth Disease [285 words]wotthefiqhDec 25, 2008 10:30
Three Points: [211 words]YnnatchkahOct 11, 2007 14:15
Vaughan Region's religions [153 words]NettieOct 9, 2007 07:13
Ahmadiyya ok [162 words]Archimedes2Oct 8, 2007 16:15
Sratch the veneer [145 words]Kamal KrazieOct 10, 2007 05:39
Ahmadiyya is not OK [91 words]dhimmi no moreOct 10, 2007 20:30
⇒ Ah, my dear, Ahmadiyya [234 words]Archimedes2Oct 10, 2007 22:33
Hello Archimedes 2 [227 words]Kamal KrazieOct 12, 2007 04:44
Builder - General Contractor announces muslim enclave plans. [50 words]Ann HallJan 4, 2008 17:04
Shunning the infidel ! [111 words]dfwhite19438Mar 21, 2008 23:15
You know, i know !! [69 words]dfwhite19438Mar 21, 2008 23:26
sad... [81 words]donvanOct 8, 2007 15:23

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page