Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Hello Archimedes 2
Reader comment on item: Permit Muslim-only Enclaves?
in response to reader comment: Ah, my dear, Ahmadiyya

Submitted by Kamal Krazie (Canada), Oct 12, 2007 at 04:44

Archimedes 2,

violence as a means of ideological assent and arming for military conflict is not the crux of my argument. I openly challenge the notion of the Ahmadiyya sect being a ‘Pluralistic' and ‘Tolerant' version of Islam. Pluralism does not create an enclave with the mosque central to its community, that simply leaves everyone else outside looking in { sounds familiar ... think all the current Islamic states }. Tolerance does not embrace and preach overt disdain of any other belief { does that also sound familiar } a contempt seasoned with a rabid intolerant proselytizing, a manifesto that simply does not belong in the 21st century.

Archimedes, absolute relativism vis-a-vis every creed is an excercise in abject futility unless the hard questions are asked! Questions begging to be answered; ? What is their vision of an exemplary society ? That is scratching the veneer that I speak of! ? Will they allow another house of worship to be built adjacent to their mosque ? Will they swear allegiance to the secular rule of law ? Will they voiceferously proclaim the sanctity of all viable spiritual beliefs ? Will they declare the universal rights and freedoms for all as their code of conduct ? Will they ?

Archimedes non-violence { from a tiny sect} is highly commendable but the litmus test does not end there!

Respectfully


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (17) on this item

Title By Date
What happened to Gwynnoaks Muslim Residential Development effort [17 words]SusyNov 13, 2009 11:37
Ignorance still rules [88 words]DavePFeb 25, 2009 18:50
May we be spared [225 words]Rebecca MouldsDec 23, 2008 18:22
God help us all [327 words]DavePFeb 25, 2009 18:32
I am outraged [1501 words]Tess McNamaraDec 22, 2008 03:56
Islamic Foot In Mouth Disease [285 words]wotthefiqhDec 25, 2008 10:30
Three Points: [211 words]YnnatchkahOct 11, 2007 14:15
Vaughan Region's religions [153 words]NettieOct 9, 2007 07:13
Ahmadiyya ok [162 words]Archimedes2Oct 8, 2007 16:15
Sratch the veneer [145 words]Kamal KrazieOct 10, 2007 05:39
Ahmadiyya is not OK [91 words]dhimmi no moreOct 10, 2007 20:30
Ah, my dear, Ahmadiyya [234 words]Archimedes2Oct 10, 2007 22:33
⇒ Hello Archimedes 2 [227 words]Kamal KrazieOct 12, 2007 04:44
Builder - General Contractor announces muslim enclave plans. [50 words]Ann HallJan 4, 2008 17:04
Shunning the infidel ! [111 words]dfwhite19438Mar 21, 2008 23:15
You know, i know !! [69 words]dfwhite19438Mar 21, 2008 23:26
sad... [81 words]donvanOct 8, 2007 15:23

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page