Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Re. "5 Years of Campus Watch" Column
Reader comment on item: Five Years of Campus Watch

Submitted by Bryan Taplits (United States), Sep 20, 2007 at 21:08

Dr. Pipes,

I respect your analytical ability tremendously, but don't you think part of your column was more than a bit elitist and innacurate.

You write, viz:, "...Who would judge them [academics]? Students suppress their views to protect their careers; peers are reluctant to criticize each other, lest they in turn suffer attacks; and laymen lack the competence to judge arcane scholarship. "

Using your logic, then, I (who am a layman), who has judged your analytical ability as-really-a delight to behold, would be to inept to judge your opinions-and to hold them as worthy of my time to read them.

Additionally, "...if laymen lack competence to judge [academics]", then any academic who writes a column read by a loyal following is really "whistling past the graveyard" because the loyal reader is unable to understand the columnist's views in order to judge them as superior.

I guess you could reply that if readers have reached a conclusion on "arcane scholarship" it is no longer "arcane". But I had to respond, if only to support-in solidarity-we "layman".

Laymen unite. We have only to lose our ineptitude!


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Daniel Pipes replies:

I was not so much passing judgment on laymen as noting a general deference that non-specialists give to specialists.

Further, when a couple of activist institutions years ago tried to do something like what Campus Watch is now doing, they were immediately overwhelmed by the Middle East studies specialists' scorn. Their one-time efforts died on the vine.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (23) on this item

Title By Date
Unfair bias [82 words]Medical ResidentSep 21, 2008 19:49
Campus Watch
[w/response] [85 words]
Robert TralinsSep 25, 2007 19:33
Who's watching Columbia [58 words]Arlinda DeAngelisSep 23, 2007 19:53
Ahmadinejad [105 words]anonOct 23, 2008 10:44
Contacting ColumbiaU URGENTLY:- AGAINST Ahmadinejad [100 words]YnnatchkahSep 23, 2007 00:54
Congratulations Campus Watch - What Next: Watch Dogs for South Asian and South East Asian Islamism. [223 words]SinghaSep 22, 2007 09:47
Congratulations!! Viva La Luz!! [259 words]Sofa SogoodSep 21, 2007 09:12
How Imperative is Campus Watch? [23 words]YnnatchkahSep 21, 2007 07:50
Everybody say hey [131 words]jennifer solisSep 21, 2007 17:43
Campus Watch IS needed! [106 words]jennifer solisSep 22, 2007 15:02
Dear Jennifer Solis: PETITION &- Bollinger E-mail. His mail box ought to be flooded.. [49 words]YnnatchkahSep 23, 2007 00:30
Happy Birthday & A BIG THANKS! [139 words]Christy from Boston, MASep 21, 2007 02:03
Campus Watch is Not Enough [161 words]Dan RusenSep 20, 2007 21:10
⇒ Re. "5 Years of Campus Watch" Column
[w/response] [185 words]
Bryan TaplitsSep 20, 2007 21:08
What the future brings [40 words]David W. LincolnSep 20, 2007 17:13
To be sure... [226 words]YnnatchkahSep 20, 2007 14:01
Academic freedoms [114 words]janusz KowalikSep 20, 2007 12:47
Thank you, Dr Pipes ! [241 words]DelcambreSep 20, 2007 11:28
Academic objectivity [100 words]Anton du PreezSep 20, 2007 10:58
Middle East Studies [27 words]Donald W. BalesSep 20, 2007 10:26
long live Campus Watch [159 words]Rebecca MouldsSep 20, 2007 10:25
Criticism but credit where credit is due? [139 words]dlpSep 20, 2007 09:37
quite right [59 words]Peter EdgarSep 20, 2007 08:30

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page