Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Martel, you do not realize
Reader comment on item: Foxbats Did Fly over Dimona
in response to reader comment: The FOXBAT mission doesn't imply the Soviets instigated the 1967 war

Submitted by Yuval Brandstetter MD (Israel), Aug 25, 2007 at 14:46

Dear Mr Martel

You do not realize how deeply the Soviets were involved in the Egyptian and Syrian armies. We are talking of instructors active down to the Battalion level. We are talking Russians manning each and every one of the command centers of the the antiaircraft missile batteries. We are talking thousands of technicians taking care of the Migs which they allowed the Arabs to fly (Mig 17, 19 and 21, and various Sukhoys) and the hundreds needed to maintain the aircraft they did not allow the Arabs to touch, such as the Mig 25 dubbed FoxBat by NATO.

We are talking legions of Israeli listeners needed to keep track of the hosts of Russians in both Egypt and Syria. This went on in egypt untill 1974, when Sadat realized open warfare was not usefull and that America could wring Israel much better than the Egyptian military. It persisted in Syria till 1982, when the Russian air-defense system went haywire and collapsed due to the massive ECM Israel applied to it. Now, 25 years later, Russia is at it again, arming Syria, Iran Hizzbullah etc. and providing Iran with Nuclear know-how. The more things change, the more they remain the same.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title By Date
A Call for More Research on the Role of State-Sponsorship in Conflicts More Generally [151 words]AlexNov 5, 2007 00:18
Saida 1982 [150 words]UgriSep 9, 2008 03:05
Daniel, please read The Fifty Year War [62 words]Tom DavisSep 21, 2007 19:10
Hiding [57 words]David W. LincolnSep 21, 2007 10:32
This stuff again? [155 words]Wayne WagnerAug 29, 2007 00:25
Of course this is not news! [47 words]MosheSep 2, 2007 06:56
The inability of the world to write about any event which exonerates Israel. [175 words]Mladen AndrijasevicAug 27, 2007 02:03
Dimona libel [91 words]jacob CH.Aug 28, 2007 12:38
Russian denial [92 words]Rebecca MouldsAug 25, 2007 17:54
The lie is compounded [214 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDAug 25, 2007 14:34
The FOXBAT mission doesn't imply the Soviets instigated the 1967 war [206 words]Charles MartelAug 24, 2007 11:45
RTWT [35 words]Brian HAug 24, 2007 17:50
⇒ Martel, you do not realize [202 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDAug 25, 2007 14:46
None of this implies the Soviets instigated the 1967 war to overfly Dimona [342 words]Charles MartelAug 27, 2007 11:21
Of course not! They overflew Dimona prior the 1967 war. [121 words]MosheSep 2, 2007 07:34
That is a different story, and plausible [133 words]Charles MartelSep 25, 2007 17:21
This was the story from its beginning, and as at last you correctly admitted: It is indeed plausible. [24 words]MosheOct 8, 2007 04:21
"Plausible" is a pretty weak statement, and I'm not blaming Israel for 1967 war [344 words]Charles Martel (the baffled)Nov 5, 2007 12:52

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page