50 readers online now

Related Topics

 

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

CAIR and the Council on Foreign Relations Endorse Mearsheimer/Walt

by Daniel Pipes
Fri, 18 Aug 2006

updated Thu, 21 Sep 2006

Print Send Comment RSS Share:    

In an odd confluence, the mail brought two related items today.

One was an announcement from the Council on American-Islamic Relations that it will host a panel on August 28 on "The Israel Lobby and the U.S. Response to the War in Lebanon" at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., starring John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, co-authors of "The Israel Lobby" study.

The other was the September/October issue of Foreign Affairs, flagship publication of the Council on Foreign Relations, a pillar of the establishment. The review section contains a rave by Middle East reviewer L. Carl Brown of that same study: "The hardheaded analysis that Mearsheimer and Walt so cogently present cries out for careful consideration. It just might set in motion a useful paradigm shift in the United States' Middle East policy."

Comments: (1) Carl Brown is an intelligent man with some original and important work to his credit; in a 1996 review of one of his books, I praised him as "the Middle East's historian with the widest vision." What impaired his judgment, what brought him down so low?

(2) How unpleasant to see the Council on Foreign Relations – of which I am a member – in agreement here with CAIR, an organization described in a recent court case as "a terrorist supporting front organization that is partially funded by terrorists, and that CAIR wishes nothing more than the implementation of Sharia law in America." But then, the CFR's public reaction to Mearsheimer/Walt fits its terrible record on Middle East affairs, as revealed in the fall 2005 Middle East Quarterly, "The Council on Foreign Relations Does the Middle East." (August 18, 2006)

Sep. 20, 2006 update: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was today received with honor and dignity at the Council on Foreign Relations. I join with Senator Rick Santorum in denouncing this act of courtesy, even if there was strenuous disagreement at the meeting itself.

Sep. 21, 2006 update: To make matters worse, Lionel Beehner, "a staff writer for the Council on Foreign Relations' website," has an article today in USA Today calling for a televised Ahmadinejad-Bush debate. I am beginning to wonder what I am doing, paying dues to an organization that endorses Mearsheimer/Walt and legitimates Ahmadinejad.

Related Topics: Antisemitism, Arab-Israeli debate in the U.S., Council on American-Islamic Relations, Muslims in the United States, Radical Islam

Trackbacks

Links to weblogs that reference this post.
TrackBack URL for this post: http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/trackback.php/655/05380/842

CAIRless love for Mearsheimer and Walt
From: Blog-o-Fascists
Excerpt: Power Line Daniel Pipes notes: In an odd confluence, the mail brought two related items today. One was an announcement from the Council on American-Islamic Relations that...

Reader comments on this weblog entry

Title By Date

I agree [2 words]

Scott 

Oct 17, 2006 21:25

CFR as the Council of Fawning Relations - Welcoming conspiracy theorists and terrorist despots [148 words]

Ben van de Polder 

Sep 21, 2006 22:57

Realism vs. Reality [410 words]

Alex 

Sep 21, 2006 17:53

Danger of Islam from within [250 words]

Kelvan Kam 

Sep 1, 2006 00:00

  The western world is going to pay a huge price for allowing Muslims to roam freely in their nations [204 words]

Stephen Phillips 

Sep 9, 2006 00:30

Agree with Dr. Pipes
[w/response] [369 words]

David Sternlight 

Aug 31, 2006 23:03

CAIR AND THE COMING POLICY SHIFT [216 words]

roert fusfeld 

Aug 31, 2006 20:57

Mearsheimer / Walt
[w/response] [77 words]

GB 

Aug 31, 2006 11:38

  what twenty mllion can buy [59 words]

leo solomon 

Sep 1, 2006 09:05

re: Foreign Policy [125 words]

a reader 

Aug 31, 2006 10:18

Mr. Brown, you need to read " [445 words]

S Silverstein 

Aug 27, 2006 20:37

Misleading statement by Dr. Pipes... [118 words]

Amjad M. Khan 

Aug 25, 2006 18:52

Comment on this weblog entry

Name
Email Address (optional)

Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Top 25 recent comments
Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

ADVERTISEMENTS