Danger of Islam from within
Reader comment on item: CAIR and the Council on Foreign Relations Endorse Mearsheimer/Walt

Submitted by Kelvan Kam (United States), Sep 1, 2006 at 00:00

Coming from Malaysia (Islamic State) myself, it is not surprise for me to find out how many muslim entities in this country would tried to distort their facts in regards to islamic terrorism and the peversion of islamic world. CAIR claimed to repudiate terrorism but on the other hand the CAIR is oppose to U.S. strategy of fighting islamic terrorism. For instance CAIR has opposed the prosecution of Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman for conspiring to blow up a world trade center and other NYC landmark in 1993 as they claimed Omar did not receive a fair trial. Also the CAIR has history of its members who support islamic terrorism.

Like many muslim entities, the CAIR is oftentimes claimed the islamic faith message were misconceived by westerners. If Islam were such a peaceful or tolerant religion, their prophet (Muhammad saw) wouldn't have called for elimination of those who do not believe in him. Treating non-Islamic believers with limited rights is not tolerant. Till these days, the islamic world has propagated hatred toward western nations due to their support of israel. The problem from islamic world does spring up not from the birth of modern israel, but from the hostile element in the name of Islam.

All law enforcement agencies in U.S. Canada and Europe should be scrutinizing Muslim organizations as a result of their involvement in support terrorist organization (including the CAIR). Without such profiling, america is granting these parasites to breed behing their backyard.

WAKE UP AMERICA

Kelvan Kam Kay Ven

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.