69 million page views

Mearsheimer / Walt

Reader comment on item: CAIR and the Council on Foreign Relations Endorse Mearsheimer/Walt

Submitted by GB (United States), Aug 31, 2006 at 11:38

You must be more specific on your rebuttal to the Council on Foreign Relations endorsement of the Israel Lobby study. Your piece gave no specific details as to why that study is flawed, or why L. Carl Brown's review was flawed.

Browns suggestion that this study deserves careful consideration is not an endorsement of it. He may be correct when saying that this study, should it pass scrutiny, might lead to changes in US Middle East policy.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

There is a whole literature on the flaws of the Israel lobby study - starting with Alex Safian's point-by-point dissection of it.

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (14) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
2Council on Foreign Relations and Tack's Tackle Shop [3630 words]John WallaceNov 28, 2008 08:09144010
I agree [2 words]ScottOct 17, 2006 21:2560773
CFR as the Council of Fawning Relations - Welcoming conspiracy theorists and terrorist despots [148 words]Ben van de PolderSep 21, 2006 22:5756916
The CFR has a long history of conspiring agianst our nation. [120 words]markOct 15, 2009 09:5056916
Realism vs. Reality [410 words]AlexSep 21, 2006 17:5356878
Danger of Islam from within [250 words]Kelvan KamSep 1, 2006 00:0054542
The western world is going to pay a huge price for allowing Muslims to roam freely in their nations [204 words]Stephen PhillipsSep 9, 2006 00:3054542
Agree with Dr. Pipes [369 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
David SternlightAug 31, 2006 23:0354537
CAIR AND THE COMING POLICY SHIFT [216 words]roert fusfeldAug 31, 2006 20:5754526
Mearsheimer / Walt [77 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
GBAug 31, 2006 11:3854472
what twenty mllion can buy [59 words]leo solomonSep 1, 2006 09:0554472
re: Foreign Policy [125 words]a readerAug 31, 2006 10:1854463
Mr. Brown, you need to read " [445 words]S SilversteinAug 27, 2006 20:3754103
Misleading statement by Dr. Pipes... [118 words]Amjad M. KhanAug 25, 2006 18:5254006

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Mearsheimer / Walt by GB

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)