Blaming Islamic Apostasy Laws on Western Imperialism

by Daniel Pipes
Thu, 30 Mar 2006
updated Mon, 3 Apr 2006

Send

Comment

RSS

The recent case of Abdul Rahman, an Afghan who converted to Christianity and was sentenced to death for doing so, has made Islamists in the West squirm. The Shari‘a is perfectly clear and unanimous about the need to execute Muslims who leave their faith, whether becoming atheists or converts to another religion. If a tutorial in the matter were needed, the Rushdie affair of 1989 provided an ample one. But it's not possible to acknowledge this fact to Westerners who, as one, condemn such intolerance.

So Islamists have come up with various ways of changing the subject or pretending they are shocked. My favorite response has to be that of one Louay M. Safi, writing in a strident Islamist website that goes under the innocuous name of Media Monitors Network (which in the past five years has attacked me over one hundred times, or nearly twice a month). Safi has the audacity to state that "the Qur'an is clear on religious freedom" and instead blames the Islamic practice prohibiting apostasy on Western imperialism. Here is his argument, in part:

The issue of apostasy, like many other issues stemming from the application of shari'ah in modern society, is rooted more in the sociopolitical conditions of contemporary Muslim societies than in Islamic values and principles. More particularly, it is rooted in the incomplete transition from traditional to modern sociopolitical organization. It is rooted in the decision of many post-colonial Muslim countries to abandon traditional legal codes informed by Islamic law (shari'ah), in favor for European legal codes developed to suit modern European societies. The new laws where enforced by state elites without any public debate, and with little attention for the need to root legal code in public morality. …

The apostasy controversy highlights the importance of allowing Islamic reformers more say in public debate about political and legal reforms, and demonstrates the extent to which world powers undercut cultural and religious reforms by backing autocratic regimes the crack down on Muslim reformers in the name of combating political Islam. To legitimize their political rule and enlist the support of religious voices, autocratic rulers often align themselves with traditional religious scholars, who embrace a literalist understanding of shari'ah and perpetuate rigid and anti-reform agenda in Muslim societies.

Comments: (1) Even someone as immersed in the Islamist mindset as myself cannot but be surprised, even wondrous, at the lack of shame displayed in such passages. (2) No doubt this argument will convince some, for the readiness to ascribe all ills to the West runs deep and wide. (March 30, 2006)

Apr. 6, 2006 update: For an in-depth analysis of tawdry, dishonest apologetics on this subject, see Robert Spencer's excoriation of a article in the Chicago Tribune by M. Cherif Bassiouni, professor of law at DePaul University and president of the International Human Rights Law Institute.

Related Topics: Anti-Christianism, Islamic law (Shari‘a)

TrackBack URL for this post: http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/trackback.php/580/412cc/482

Reader comments on this weblog entry

Title	By	Date
apostasy in islam [381 words]	lekan	Apr 29, 2006 16:36
Islamic Apostacy [w/response] [297 words]	Stephen Berman	Apr 10, 2006 13:22
↔ Religions do change? [154 words]	Stephen Berman	Apr 12, 2006 11:41
The importance of allowing Islamic "reformers" more air time [129 words]	Katherine Mclean	Apr 7, 2006 22:02
Pure anachronism [121 words]	Denis MacEoin	Apr 7, 2006 17:18
Those wacky Muslims! [31 words]	Dr RJP	Apr 7, 2006 15:55
As always, it's about the law [134 words]	Victor Purinton	Apr 6, 2006 15:38
↔ Religious Laws on Western Lands [137 words]	Levi Bell	Nov 16, 2006 01:48
solution to Sharia excesses [120 words]	Joe E.	Apr 5, 2006 17:03
↔ excuse for what ? [159 words]	lekan	Apr 29, 2006 16:50
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 18) [197 words]	Jack Daniels	Apr 4, 2006 01:18
↔ Ode To Jack Daniels (lurv the drink) [80 words]	diggerdeviant	Apr 4, 2006 08:56
Louay Safi - Saudi attack dog - blamed US for terror bust at his IIIT [126 words]	Ben van de Polder	Apr 4, 2006 00:40
some holes... [112 words]	Taj Ashaheed	Apr 3, 2006 20:37

Comment on this weblog entry

Name	Email Address (optional) Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments:
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. Top 25 recent comments Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

ADVERTISEMENTS