Pure anachronism

Submitted by Denis MacEoin (United Kingdom), Apr 7, 2006 at 17:18

As in many other cases, the argument that recourse to the death sentence for apostasy derives from the taint of Western imperialism is simply anachronistic. Shari'a law on this point was established centuries before the impact of the West on Islam, and modern judges cite the same sources. To state that Islamic reformers have not been allowed their say because of Western pressures is a reversal of the facts.

Genuine reformers in Islam have found themselves tarred with the brush of apostasy; the Salafi movement, which claims to represent a wave of reform is, in fact, entirely backward looking and has been responsible for most of the restraints placed on reformers who have tried to bring Islam into the modern world.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".