69 million page views

re: entertainment value

Reader comment on item: Casey, Santorum and Jerusalem
in response to reader comment: entertainment value!

Submitted by true believer (India), Jun 26, 2006 at 07:28

I suppose you have not stopped twisting or shaking after reading my previous post. Apart from entertainment , your ideas are not worth much though you yourself sound a bit too over-confident. Humour and sarcasm are two different things, don't mistake one for the other. Just because you have the heart of a child... does'nt mean that people must accept your arguments at their face value. This is a compliment, no offence intended. You know, real people with real ideas largely ignore your comments except at times under extreme provocation.

>>Your original fantasy "I personally seem to believe that Eastern church sees in Muslims as being the guardians of the Christian legacy in Palestine-Israel."

..is stretchhhhhhhhing imagination beyond all imaginable limits. if it were intended as humour, I admit that I completely missed it.

>>You said "The idea here is that Jerusalem is good for the 3 religions and not exclusively for one"

My response as usual "Jerusalem will continue to be good for all religions, provided it does not fall into moslem hands" Moslems can NEVER be trusted to ensure this, given their dubious track record till date. Moslems will always want Jerusalem exclusively for themselves. Period.

Happy to see that you are attempting to be rational without anyone ordering you to ;-) It's a welcome change. This way you will command some respect.

..all the best.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Progressives admitted: Ahmad Shukeiri assured 'throwing Jews into sea' was literal [216 words]DaliaJun 18, 2021 08:17268409
1When Shukairy admitted his pre six-day war call throwing "the Jews into sea" [143 words]ElyJul 5, 2020 08:03259535
Totally agree, I live in Europe and it does not work otherwise [139 words]IgnacioJun 21, 2006 15:1748009
Capital [238 words]John RJun 17, 2006 13:0547834
A modest proposal [305 words]Jon - a brit in EurolandJun 16, 2006 09:4247762
You are wrong Harrak, Christians are victims in both cases but more victims with Muslims [49 words]AnwarJun 15, 2006 21:2847737
Casey should have and probably did know [100 words]Stuart M BliwasJun 15, 2006 19:4347734
Don't Hold Your Breath [50 words]BlackspeareJun 15, 2006 18:1047732
happy endings [180 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDJun 15, 2006 16:0247728
The threefold impact of Jerusalem [266 words]HarrakJun 14, 2006 21:1347690
You are wrong again [391 words]true believerJun 16, 2006 07:0147690
You argument has a hole..better cover it next time [375 words]HarrakJun 16, 2006 19:3947690
Your argument itself is a BIG hole [472 words]true believerJun 19, 2006 10:0747690
My argument has a big hole in which you fell! [198 words]HarrakJun 19, 2006 17:5547690
Your hole is getting bigger than your argument [385 words]true believerJun 21, 2006 05:1047690
entertainment value! [89 words]HarrakJun 25, 2006 13:2947690
Excellent entertainment! [77 words]AdmirerJun 26, 2006 02:3847690
re: entertainment value [228 words]true believerJun 26, 2006 07:2847690

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)