69 million page views

the trap of over-abstractions

Reader comment on item: Salman Rushdie Was Never Safe
in response to reader comment: and more to the point,

Submitted by myth (Germany), Aug 20, 2022 at 20:02

David, I would rephrase your larger point that the US government and the wider Western World get distracted by over-abstractions where the concrete and the obvious is sufficient. Your language seems to fall into the same trap of over-abstractions. "highlighting the danger" sounds like a euphemism to me. Salman fighting for his life in the ICU is well beyond the word "danger". I have a feeling you would advocate military retaliation against Iran rather than some obscure "highlighting", right? I certainly would. What I see is this: State-Islam from Iran is fighting a real war in the West with the help of muslim volunteers.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)