Rebellion to the Truth Not Airtight Defense for Disobedience to Truth - Islam Cannot Replace Truth It Cannot Defend

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Aug 11, 2022 at 21:25

Reader Prashant reiterates a long held assertion that Bibles are corrupted - but whose version does that allegation apply? Chaldean, Paleo-Hebrew, Aramaic, Koinea Greek, Arabic, Persian; and that's ueven before the Latin and other translations. The Quran has its own issues, as al-Tabari and his contemporaries can attest.
Psychologists will never admit to supernatural influences, so their testimonies are limited as well.
There is physical evodence that a Messianic Rabbi went before the religious authorities and the Roman governor and was put to death. Their are religous witnesses that left testimonies of His being risen and is alive in the hearts of those who believe. Not even the most secular of the pyschiatrists and psychologists can successfully argue against the reality of eternal life in the risen Messiah. Even the Quran fails in that.
If tBiblical narrative was so misinformed in the past, why are its premises of history unfolding before the world today? Isn't the issue of Israel's battle with Islam enough to show its truth. Islam has lost already; and no one is ready to admit that truth, now are they?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".