69 million page views

Adding to Dave's argument: Islamic franchiise (lose coalition) serves two negative human needs

Reader comment on item: Will Islam Survive Islamism?
in response to reader comment: Islamism has become like Rome, and will fall

Submitted by Prashant (United States), Nov 16, 2021 at 22:53

Dear Dr Pipes, The reader Dave wrote an insightful letter "Islamism has become like Rome, and will fall" to your blog. I agree with Dave's conclusion that Islamism will fall but I think the parallels that he draws between the Roman empire and some economic events of ancient times (like taxing if Christians by Persian rulers) are over drawn, Islam is a 14-century long phenomenon spread over huge regions of the world. Islamic history may have similarities with other events in the human history, but the analogies will never be able to explain Islam of all times and places.

I will provide my explanations to the ancient Islamic phenomenons. First, regarding Muhamad, I think besides being a religious zealot, he was also a master politician. He strategized his plans with enough selfishness and stratagem. He had no qualms about making and breaking strategic treaties and winning brutal violent battles. What we see today as loots from Muhamad's ancient raids and what looks small loots of war-tools and women to us, was a source of revenue and power to Muhammad and his followers. After winning enough raids in his early Medina years, Muhamad got addicted to these violent methods. While looting other nations was a standard operating procedure at that time of human history, Muhammad was the only major religion-founder who used organized violence as modus-operendi. When you win revenue, it becomes your obligation to defend and protect that revenue. That led to the concept of the Islamic State that was started by Muhammad in his own time and raises its head even today, I would like to remind the readers that Muhamad died in the year 632 and the first siege of Jerusalem started just four years later in 636, So, Muhammad created the cultural foundation --if not militaristic foundation-- of this siege within his life time.

Second, it seems both Shoemaker whom Dave quotes and Dave himself give the Abbassid empire too much credit for the success or corruption of the original Islam. Every theory or doctrine --even scientific ones-- need someone to formalize and codify it. The Abbassids formalized the formula that was already working: mark everyone who is not a Muslim, make them a target, and, then, loot and/or convert them. It was convenient to make Jews and Christians believer-partners sometimes and kafirs-enemies the other times as dictated by the political needs of the times and geographies. It is not a surprise that when Christians were attacking Jerusalem, Muslims tried to become friends with the Jews. What else?

Let us not forget that all this time Muhamad was a religious leader as well. Islam, after all, was the freshest and best monotheistic religion. This also, exactly, explains the "good-muslim bad-muslim" dichotomy that we have to deal with even today. When no expansion is called for, every Muslim is a "good Muslim". But when Islam gets into the expansion mode (as in today's Kashmir, PA, and Nigeria) a higher percent than normal of these good Muslims become "bad Muslims" incognito. If Nizis need a good person, they will dig every grave in Germany and will find none among them. When Muslims need a good cop, he is omnipresent in the meighborhood Mosque.

Third, Dave (and probably Shoemaker) calls early Islam a "lose coalition of believers". This lose coalition can also be called franchised violent expansionism. The unifying factor of the franchise is, of course, the faith. Muslims make their communities around the central facets of the religion. These communities are united not by common ethical, economical, culinary, business or cultural principles, They are united by Islamic terminologies and practices. And, by a common desire to advance Islam (Muhammad's initial idea, survives). And, these communities fight the wars against non-Muslims together. For example, almost no Islamic countries or people speak against PA, or Kashmiri Muslims. They do not even speak against child-kidnapper Boko Harams! The islamic franchise is still losely knitted together via the religion and it still fights violent wars.

Finally, Islam fulfills two human needs beautifully. People like community built around a rallying cry and people like to win against others. On these two things ethics play little role. When we come back winners, we just say that every thing is fair in love and war. Case closed. Throughout its history, Islam has provided a rallying cry to the converts and has yielded hundreds of brutal wins, No Muslim laments that Muslims brutalized Spain, Constatinople, Persia, Sindh and Jerusalem. Why should they? Victory is sweet even when the vanquished were your ancestors!

So, what has changed now? And, where is the hope? The hope is in the laws of nature. When you do wrong, the wrong does happen. Islamic wrong is still happening, Some of us are talking about the Yezidis who were destroyed by the Muslims not too far ago. Many of us have not forgotten the killings on the TV and shootings in the bars and streets of London, Paris, New York or Mumbai. And, when you do wrong, it becomes more amd more expensive to defend your bad deals (specially in this age of social media). More and more Muslims now realize that defending Islam is a bigger pain in the neck than letting it be. That is the hope. And, that is why Dave is so right when he says that Islamism will fall.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (40) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Israelophobia: Dislike of or prejudice against Israel - When it crosses the line of legitimate criticism. The obsession [1464 words]BernardMay 8, 2022 07:09280828
There is no such thing as Israelo-phobia; let us not copy Islamic tendency to lie [215 words]prashantMay 8, 2022 12:11280828
Arab Islamic "Palestinian" butchers targeting another peaceful, pious town [1192 words]GilaMay 5, 2022 19:40280686
Obsession with Islam [31 words]PrashantMay 6, 2022 17:38280686
No Mistaking (Iranian Islamic Inspired Proxy Act) Intention of Provoking Israel - No Matter What [138 words]M ToveyMay 6, 2022 18:06280686
Political motives behind the night journey [311 words]PrashantMay 7, 2022 12:00280686
Putin apologizes for Lavrov Nazi remarks, congratulates Israel on its Independence Day - [429 words]NoamMay 5, 2022 12:32280663
1"Palestinian" Islamic fascist Hamas stirring Euro pot, soon after Lavrov's Nazi rhetoric [48 words]NicoleMay 4, 2022 05:26280596
1Islam in retreat. [39 words]Reynald de ChatillonJan 10, 2022 23:21278099
1The Context of "Arab Spring" [527 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
LudvikusDec 10, 2021 11:21277208
39-11, Afganistan a Failed State, Again Under the Taliban [375 words]LudvikusJan 17, 2022 22:12277208
2Demanding separation-of-church-and-state from Muslims [227 words]PrashantJan 19, 2022 11:14277208
3Calling out Ilhan Omar's hypocrisy [385 words]PrashantDec 3, 2021 03:37277036
2Hundreds of death threats [148 words]JeffDec 5, 2021 20:48277036
2Thanking people for their support [62 words]PrashantDec 5, 2021 21:48277036
2News on Ilhan Omar's recent activity [257 words]PrashantMay 3, 2022 14:31277036
1Islamist passes for a genuine polical refugee [88 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
mythNov 20, 2021 13:27276706
2Very Thought Provoking [18 words]Larry R.Nov 17, 2021 03:19276634
3Islamism has become like Rome, and will fall [532 words]DaveNov 16, 2021 18:15276601
4Adding to Dave's argument: Islamic franchiise (lose coalition) serves two negative human needs [891 words]PrashantNov 16, 2021 22:53276601
1Historical research finds two Muhammads [80 words]DaveNov 17, 2021 15:18276601
1Historical research finds two Muhammads [80 words]DaveNov 18, 2021 09:17276601
Muhammad 1 and Muhammad 2 and the inscriptions of al-Masjid al-Aqsa [216 words]dhimmi no moreNov 18, 2021 15:26276601
History Cannot Distinguish Between the Legend, Myth, or Reality of Muhammad-Neither Do the Successors [222 words]M ToveyNov 18, 2021 16:33276601
1The Easter Bunny did not lead the Arab conquests [123 words]DaveNov 18, 2021 20:44276601
3Sheikh Easter Bunny Sala Allahu 'Alyhi wa Salam and our dear Dave [223 words]dhimmi no moreNov 20, 2021 17:06276601
Guiding the perplexed, our dear Dave! The Easter Bunny and Winged Flying Mules and Goats that eat holy books [735 words]dhimmi no moreNov 22, 2021 10:30276601
Religious Guesses Do Not Gain Entry Into Eternity [441 words]M ToveyNov 22, 2021 14:04276601
Conundrum to Quandary - When Humanity Finally Learns the Truth - Before it's Too Late [144 words]M ToveyNov 22, 2021 20:00276601
2Time Is Not On The Side of Religion [21 words]Barry BlackNov 16, 2021 15:51276599
Time is Running Out for Religion - Religion Cannot Save Humanity [367 words]M ToveyNov 17, 2021 10:20276599
1Thank You [30 words]Barry BlackNov 17, 2021 13:10276599
Conundrum of Religion - Whose Interpretation is Correct? [269 words]M ToveyNov 18, 2021 10:57276599
1Does Religion Define a Person's Belief [293 words]M ToveyNov 16, 2021 13:33276592
3Plainly [11 words]Zulk MashtaNov 16, 2021 11:26276590
5People with choice, chose wisely [286 words]Basat TAYFUNNov 16, 2021 04:40276584
2How can the world help? [14 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mr BeanNov 16, 2021 03:56276583
Give people a chance to like/dislike your responses to people [31 words]PrashantNov 16, 2021 23:08276583
Vain Hope of Improvement in Islam [190 words]Richard JordanNov 15, 2021 23:00276574
3Islamism [3 words]Edward L. MayNov 15, 2021 22:28276573

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)