69 million page views

Short-Sighted Patronization of 'Palestinian' Political Intrigues

Reader comment on item: Is Israel Victory Still Needed?
in response to reader comment: Congratulations to Dr. Pipes on an Israeli victory

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Nov 24, 2020 at 17:07

Peace Agreement did not Change Political Intentions:

While there is the sense that this post appears somewhat genuine in its presentation, a further sense that there is an underlying tone of sarcasm and disingenuous sentiments, all based on earlier representations of the poster, which give a thought to the potential patronization of the more intrinsic subject matter than what might be considered serious political implications towards Israel.
Simply put, it would be considered an insult to the UAE, Bahrain, potentially the Sudan and more embarrassingly, the Saudi and other Arab kingdoms; yet considering the source, that they might believe they have conceded any of their own sovereignty while coming to a conclusion that Israel does indeed, deserve a chance at peace in the community of the Middle East.
There is the further mistake, one that would appear to be easily made from a region that has little to offer the 'Palestinian' people in a respite or relief of their self-imposed isolationist tendencies derived from historical misrepresentations, that the 'Palestinian' people are somehow suffering extreme issues except those from their own leadership.
It is further inferred that non-Arab interlopers (including some sentiments from American secularistic democratic socialists) are not the best arbiters of what solutions are required to give the 'Palestinian' people a sense of their own security, since incitement from outsiders (like non-Arab Muslim ideological antipathies) appears to keep them trapped without any sense of hope.
Answer to No 1- Simple: do not shoot at Israel and they will have no reason to shoot back!
Answer to No 2 – that has been offered and categorically rejected by leadership who do not want to lose power! BTW, a two-state solution was never a starter: ask anyone in the PA power structure who will tell the truth, in English, Hebrew, and not just in Arabic.
Answer to No 3 – Something that a non-Arab will find hard to understand: 'Palestinians' are just as Arab as any other descendant of Ismael is with rights to live in peace; and the Arab League is not defeated in the UAE/Bahraini agreement, so there is no loss of face in seeking peace with neighbors respecting others.
My apologies Dr. Pipes, for butting in.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)