1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Is "Congressional" approval really needed?

Reader comment on item: Obama's Iran Deal Has the Makings of a Catastrophe

Submitted by Michael Francis Kiely (United States), Jul 22, 2015 at 14:21

The focus in the Iran nuclear agreement has now shifted to whether Congress will approve the agreement. But must Congress, that is both Houses of Congress, approve this treaty with Iran? The answer is clearly "No". Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution clearly states that the President "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur . . ." What could be more clear?

Thus, the President has to submit this agreement, which by any analysis is a treaty, to the Senate for its approval. The Constitution does not contain any role for the House of Representatives in this process, and there is no silly 60-day deadline for action by the Senate. But someone will say that Congress passed a law specifically to provide the process by which Congress would approve or disapprove this agreement. But that argument is legally bogus. The process has been in place since 1787, and Congress can not change the Constitution merely by passing a law. What if Congress passed a law that said the President could be impeached by a simple majority of the U.S. Senate with no role for the House? Would such a law override the impeachment provisions in Article I, Section 3 of the same Constitution? Of course not. Then why should the Advice and Consent provisions of Article II be ignored?

Unless the President and the Senate follow the Constitution in considering this treaty with Iran, then it will be a nullity, and future Presidents will be free to ignore it.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Is "Congressional" approval really needed? by Michael Francis Kiely

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)