69 million page views

Non Sequitor Really? and our dear Caleb is blaming the victims like a typical Turk

Reader comment on item: Further Thoughts on Koran Burning
in response to reader comment: Even a **non sequitur** has two sides

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 29, 2010 at 07:53

Our dear Caleb so you think i should tell ... the Turkish ministry of propaganda that you agree that there really was an Armenian Genocide? Oh I guess this would be "non sequitor right? But what do you think would happen to you? Let me guess lose your little cushy job posting drivel?

>Just what Imam Rauf's

Oh you mean the so called sheikh Abdul Rauf al-ikhwani?

>troubles in residential real estate have to do with the proposed Park51 Islamic Center is something I can't figure out.

Oh yeah it is the old rubbing salt in the wound and the more dirt the better

>It's an even wilder leap of logic ( a **non sequitur**-and-a-half) to parallel this with swamp league preacher Terry Jones and his Big Idea, BUT

"non sequitor'? Masha'llah ya roh baba you need to learn Arabic before you try any other language or your Allah would be unhappy as the poor guy does not speak neither Latin nor Turkish

>Having had some personal experience managing buildings with destructive tenants, the kind that sabotage smoke and CO alarms for the salable electronic parts they contain, who have no money to buy furniture and so bring furniture in from the street--with the bedbugs infesting it--who pay rent only when the marshal is at the door to evict them, I can assure you there are two sides to every

Oh did you lose your job as a Turkish propagandist? Good and it serves you right

>"slumlord" accusation.

He is a slumlord and oh blame the victims typical Turkish mentality

>If the city or county government has to pay building owners to house them, the tenants in question are no bargain!

Oh blame the victims typical ! Shame on you

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (33) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
31yes i agree with u mr. ravi ranjan singh [5 words]simardeep singhDec 14, 2010 12:29180952
Rushdie Rules Reach New Jersey/New York [21 words]johnOct 4, 2010 23:52178968
6Nothing bad about burning Koran [214 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
ViiitSep 25, 2010 11:08178680
Constructive communication [252 words]ViiitSep 28, 2010 18:03178680
1"Where they burn books..." [12 words]CalebSep 28, 2010 20:33178680
2must be condemned [52 words]shumailSep 29, 2010 03:59178680
1"Burn the Koran Day" is a very good idea. It has to be done properly. [182 words]ViiitOct 12, 2010 21:21178680
7yes and no both [141 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh BharatPanthiOct 23, 2010 05:28178680
15All books are not same [48 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh BharatPanthiOct 23, 2010 11:29178680
Ravi, freedom to speak and write is indivisible [28 words]calebOct 23, 2010 22:06178680
it is otherway here, [23 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh BharatPanthiOct 24, 2010 09:07178680
No matter how many books you burn, Ranjan Singh... [13 words]CalebOct 24, 2010 23:05178680
Whom you are talking about [94 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh BharatPanthiOct 26, 2010 16:25178680
5yes and no both [141 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh BharatPanthiOct 26, 2010 16:35178680
2Ranjan Singh needs much remediation [58 words]CalebOct 26, 2010 23:15178680
good attempt, but not right [94 words]Ravi Ranjan SinghOct 29, 2010 10:22178680
1Pastor Jones should pay [71 words]CalebSep 25, 2010 02:26178670
3The goose and the gander [248 words]dhimmi no moreSep 26, 2010 07:59178670
Even a **non sequitur** has two sides [139 words]CalebSep 27, 2010 18:55178670
2Non Sequitor Really? and our dear Caleb is blaming the victims like a typical Turk [290 words]dhimmi no moreSep 29, 2010 07:53178670
Who should pay? [10 words]JohnOct 4, 2010 23:38178670
7He already paid for those books [42 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh BharatPanthiOct 26, 2010 16:30178670
4Islamists always manage to lose! [174 words]RajeevSep 24, 2010 03:27178649
Koran Burning - Enough Already [118 words]SoloviewSep 22, 2010 22:46178595
3Fair is fair [87 words]WilksSep 22, 2010 13:22178579
Islamic law (Sharia) [95 words]Bryant HopkinsSep 21, 2010 14:50178525
1Burning American Flag [65 words]Abhay DixitSep 21, 2010 12:38178513
what you promise in return? [84 words]Ravi Ranjan SinghOct 29, 2010 10:41178513
6BRITISH POLICE STATE GOES MAD OVER KORAN BURNING! [111 words]ShroppySep 21, 2010 10:13178507
7what is wrong in being Racist [29 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh BharatPanthiSep 22, 2010 08:11178507
2Racism is natural. [75 words]ViiitOct 20, 2010 11:07178507
7Koran burning and viceversa [105 words]SHmuel HaLeviSep 21, 2010 09:23178504
7Floating Principles [62 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh BharatPanthiOct 21, 2010 02:45178504

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Non Sequitor Really? and our dear Caleb is blaming the victims like a typical Turk by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)