69 million page views

SINGHA WAS ON THE MONEY, but didn't scratch the surface of the issues.

Reader comment on item: Washington Protects the Terror Masters [in Courtrooms]
in response to reader comment: Musharraf and Pakistan have fooled Washington Maximum - 10 Billion Dollars and Counting, Much of It Will Boost Islamism

Submitted by HILDA E. DAVIS (United States), Jan 11, 2008 at 14:52

After hearing on the news today that Musharraf will treat "Americans as invaders" I agree with Singha 100%. Like many Americans, I wanted to believe that Musharraf had good intentions. I am now convinced, and believe his intentions were simply to get our money and use it to benefit himself and his terrorist cohorts that mean us nothing but harm.

Our government won't take actions against those right here in the U.S. why would we expect them to take action against Musharrat? Why the Democrats in Washington believe we were wrong in going into Iraq, and want to bring our military home, vs., fighting the war on terrorism overseas, they evidently want to fight it right here on American soil. It's common knowledge that our agents cut un-necessary deals with terrorist that will ultimately cause us major harm right here in our country. They open the doors for us to be hurt right here in our own country.

I know from first hand experience that our federal agencies and agents have things handed to them on a silver platters and they do nothing to remove these terrorist from our country or to protect the American people from harm.

There are many of these individuals that come here to our country, commit their crimes that our agencies are aware of, i.e., they form their own corporations, obtain a business license to operate their business, i.e., convenience stores, cigar stores, restaurants, auto, truck and van rentals, etc., and funnel the money to the leader of their terrorist cells right here in the U.S. to ultimately be used to hurt us, yet our agencies do nothing.

Our state agencies, our towns and counties are as blind as our federal agencies when it comes to protecting us. They're asleep, their minds are still back in the 60's, 70's and 80's, they think that we're fine. They can't comprehend what's happening right under their noses, and what will ultimately explode right in their faces.

Then when we're lucky enough to get a real charge on one of the illegals, our federal agents step in and protect them from prosecution, allowing them to continue laughing at the "Stupid American's" and to continue their criminal acts, with the major one being funneling money to terrorist groups around the world. Or even better than that, they cut useless deals, protecting the criminals and their families, and allow them to continue their criminal acts.

What would you think if you had provided evidence to federal and state agencies verifying that a Lebanese man was here in our country illegally, that you had his own handwritten ledger showing hundreds of thousands of dollars in income from the cigarette smuggling operation he and his brother were a big part of on the east coast, outlining how every dime was laundered in buying land, which he sold with a fraudulent deed, opened his own business, which he failed to file personal property taxes on for ten years, married an American woman while still married to his Lebanese wife, why we even had a witness that the brother was caught smuggling, and cut a deal with the feds, which we have to assume protected the bigamous brother, and the FBI states to you that "If they do anything serious, they'll take action"....what a crock!

How would you react, what would you do when they are forced to pick up the illegal for deportation after he tries to get full custody of the child to keep him in the country, and while he's in federal custody our agents approach him and offer him a job with our government as a translator??? Well, he has no balls, and wouldn't consider going back to the middle east, but gave the name of his niece, who was part of the smuggling operation, and our government hires her and puts her in the position to endanger the lives of our men and women overseas and here at home?

What would you think when this illegal can come and go on our military bases far easier than you and I? What would you think if you knew he attended the Marine Ball, and had a base commander to his home for dinner to celebrate his promotion, and that all he had to do was dial a number and someone from on base would come pick him up and take him on base. Does this sound like something our government should tolerate, or allow to happen? Why did our government spend millions putting up new fencing, when illegals can come and go as they please?

It's not just those leaders in the Middle East we need to watch, we need to closely watch our leaders right here in the U.S. We need to question our state legislatures as to why new laws haven't been put into affect that would prevent illegals from doing the things they're doing. Our state law makers need to cancel every drivers license issued to anyone that can't prove they're in our state legally. N.C. DMV even renews license for illegals, stating that no information is required on renewals of drivers license....good answer, right?

Is it more important for our cities and towns to have the income produced from the issuance of a Business License for an illegal than it is to protect us? Why don't we have laws that required each enity issuing a Corporate or business license, or even a driver's license in our country to require proof of citizenship? We as american's have no problem providing our birth certificates, I sure wouldn't mind having to do it to protect my country, would you?

Maybe I've got it all confused, maybe I should leave it to our federal law makers to make these rules, maybe as a little ole lady, I don't have enough sense to understand what's needed to protect our country. Maybe, I'm looking at our government all wrong when I see they can track cows to their stalls anywhere in the world, but can't understand why our government can't track illegals here in our country. Maybe I'm wrong when I believe that a Federal INS Judge that allows an illegal a "VD" Voluntary Departure, is wrong, when a requirement to be granted a VD is that individual must be a person of good moral character to qualify, and maybe I'm wrong when I believe that someone that commits crimes that could be punished under the RICO Act, and Bigamy, Fraud, etc., shouldn't qualify for a VD. Maybe I'm wrong when a Federal Judge who stated to me that the INS Judge did no wrong in allowing the VD, is wrong!!! If I'm wrong, SHOW ME. PROVE TO ME I'M WRONG. SHOW ME AND PROVE TO ME THAT THE FBI DIDN'T REMOVE EVIDENCE FROM THIS ILLEGAL'S FILE THAT WOULD HAVE PREVENTED THE JUDGE MAKING SUCH A CRIMINAL DECISION. PROVE TO ME THAT THE EVIDENCE WAS STILL IN THE FILE, AS THE ICE AGENTS STATED IT WOULD BE. PROVE TO ME THAT THIS MAN DIDN'T COMMIT BIGAMY, FOR WHICH THE LOCAL DA WON'T GET AN INDICTMENT. PROVE TO ME THAT THE FBI, OR THIS MANS ATTORNEY(s) SHOULDN'T BE CHARGED WITH AIDING AND ABETTING AN ILLEGAL ALIEN FOR THEIR OWN PERSONAL GAIN, HASN'T TOLD THE DA TO LET IT GO. PROVE TO ME THAT THIS MANS BOND SHOULDN'T BE FORFEITED, AND A BENCH WARRANT ISSUED FOR HIS ARREST SO HE COULD BE BROUGHT BACK FOR PROSECUTION OF HIS CRIMES.

IF ANYONE CAN PROVE ME WRONG, I WILL GLADY APOLOGIZE TO ANYONE I'VE OFFENDED, BUT UNTIL SOMEONE CAN PROVE ME WRONG, I INTEND TO CONTINUE MY EFFORTS TO SEEK JUSTICE. IF THE LORD'S WILLING, HE WILL BLESS ME WITH MANY MORE YEARS HERE ON EARTH, AND HOPEFULLY, I WILL LIVE LONG ENOUGH TO SEE JUSTICE DONE, AND THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INJUSTICE THAT TAKES PLACE IN OUR COUNTRY EVERY DAY PUNISHED FOR THEIR WRONGFUL ACTS.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to SINGHA WAS ON THE MONEY, but didn't scratch the surface of the issues. by HILDA E. DAVIS

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2021 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)