Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

deja-vu, all over again
Reader comment on item: Middle East Debate: Should Washington Actively Promote an Israeli-Palestinian Peace Settlement?

Submitted by John W. McGinley (United States), May 11, 2003 at 14:43

What's going on now is just a terrible nightmare. As though NOTHING AT ALL was learned from the "peace process" obtaining from 1993 to Sept of 2000. It is really tragic. The villian in the process is a man I very much admire. President Bush. He is SO hung up in trying to persuade the world and the Arabs in particular that his war on terrorism is not a war on Islam that he doesn't trust that this is already self-evident except in those circles which already hte the United States. So he figures he must "prove" his `good faith' with this "roadmap" deal. It really is tragic. For me, Pipes is boringly accurate. But most people don't see it that way, so I guess it's not boring. The Palestinians must be defeated into giving up the crazy dream that they can get rid of Israel. It just ain't goin' happen. The Sharon government is about twelve to eighteen months away from this happy outcome which, as Pipes repeatedly points out, will benefit the Plaestinaians more than anyone else. The "roadmap" business will simply be a regression of the worst sort and, eventually, a most tragic regression. Further, it will significantly HURT rather than help the interests of the United States. Can anyone get the attention of the President on this? Did someone whisper "Condoleeza Rice?" thanks for listening.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (12) on this item

Title By Date
palestinian /israeli peace. [133 words]ToqueerOct 6, 2009 13:16
war [78 words]danielDec 8, 2005 06:51
Quantifying bias [333 words]Mladen AndrijasevicMay 17, 2003 11:20
End Game Has Never Changed on Arab Side [309 words]Mike NMay 13, 2003 04:26
Kudos on your comment and insight. Bravo [269 words]Wiseman DawoodyMay 13, 2003 00:45
Something wrong with Indyk's soul [91 words]CaptainmikeMay 13, 2003 00:15
Caution about Hebron Jews [189 words]Robert BreslauerMay 12, 2003 00:53
⇒ deja-vu, all over again [229 words]John W. McGinleyMay 11, 2003 14:43
The Middle East Debate [182 words]Arlinda DeAngelisMay 11, 2003 14:08
Israel needs to get tough with them [97 words]David CottunMay 11, 2003 09:50
Daniel Pipes - as astute as ever [279 words]Lionel GaffenMay 11, 2003 04:12
Prediction Accuracy Hit Ratio [69 words]Mladen AndriasevicMay 11, 2003 03:44

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page