Submitted by tafa(United States), Feb 21, 2007 at 04:03
Lets call him by the name he calls himself. Said-i Kurdi.. i've never seen in anywhere in his books that he calls himself Ottoman,Turk or whatever But Said-i Kurdi..If we read him,follow him why would it matter whether he is a gypsye or a kurd, but if he is a kurd then why do not we just accept it.is it too difficult to accept that? just like saladin ayubi he is a kurd,he says he is, God created him as one and he is a kurd....
I think in order to understand him well, not just the way we individually want to accept him but just the way truly he is and he thinks we have to accept and recognize who he is and then we could reach a better understanding of him.
S.A
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.