Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

No Historical Reconcilliation Until Arafat is Out
Reader comment on item: Arafat's Failure May Offer Seeds of Hope

Submitted by Natalie Hassman (United States), May 7, 2002 at 05:39

It seems highly unlikely that the PA's demise and Arafat's humiliation can open up opportunities for Palestine's historical reconcilliation with Israel and acceptance of its existence. First, the terrorist infraststrucutre has been significantly degraded but not completely destroyed. Second, with the exception of a jailed Barghouti, the rest of the PA leadership -- who planned and executed the war of terror against Israel -- is practically intact. Third, it is Arafat's victory that he did survive against all odds, not only physically but politically, and is now being given a second chance as a "prudent" leader by the Bush administration and the Europeans. The EU and the World Bank plan to continue financing the corrupt Palestinian leadership without placing any reasonable restrictions on its use of terror. The Palestinian people have been radicalized and impoverished by intifada. If the survey data is accurate, ie around 70% Palestinians support suicidal bombers, these supporters of terror cannot be expected to support Israel's existence. For their part, the Israeli public today is hopefully less gullible; traumatized by terror, it would be unwilling to be duped into accepting deals with PA leaders tainted by their connection to terrorism. The Israelis have also learned a lesson that the non-Jewish world is blind to their suffering and is grossly unfair in the treatment of their plight, their deeds and their leaders. The European boycott and the media war against Israel -- played against the background of burning synagogues in France -- will be imprinted on the Israeli national psyche as a new post-Holocaust trauma. A Palestinian state -- unless it is completely demilitarized and democratized -- will not be acceptable to the majority of the Israeli electorate and political parties. And as long as this is untenable, no reconciliation would be possible. So if Bush and Powell have a quick-fix OSLO II in mind, we can expect another round of government crisis, which will lead to Sharon's ultimate resignation and Bibi's victory in the early elections. Acceptance of Israel's existence can only be secured by a new Palestinian leadership. The models of Serbia and Afghanistan can be tried in Palestine. No strategic planner, however, seriously considered a peaceful resolution in Serbia with Milosevic at the helm or -- better yet -- the rebuilding of Afghanistan presided by Al Qaida and Bin Laden. Powell's doctrine that left Saddam in Iraq had proven to be a failure that would require more money and perhaps lives in the near future. So why test a failing strategy again in Palestine when history teaches us that terrorist dictators cannot bring stability or initiate political change? It looks that brilliant retired generals are too blind to learn lessons from their own blunders and they wish to test their failed strategies elsewhere. Unfortunately, these blunders cost human lives.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (26) on this item

Title By Date
What is the world thinking????? [43 words]MassimoNov 14, 2005 14:09
To commenter Mirko Badul [49 words]LeslieDec 9, 2002 20:10
Time will tell [43 words]A. NimmerSep 26, 2002 07:51
After Likud vote, lets take another look at it. [571 words]Jay BeaMay 14, 2002 20:50
The Shadow of the Palestinian National Charter [133 words]Eva GoldmanMay 9, 2002 18:09
Time for Arafat to Go [39 words]Robert SpitalnickMay 9, 2002 16:44
No reason to give Palestinians a state [105 words]Jay BeaMay 9, 2002 10:26
Understand Arafat's Goal [18 words]Greg OfieshMay 9, 2002 00:07
Compromising on Terror will bring annihilation of the West [157 words]R. CrockettMay 8, 2002 16:55
The UN and Israel [60 words]William J. SturmMay 8, 2002 08:47
Misunderstood Nature of Palestinian War [176 words]Donald VogelMay 8, 2002 01:06
Credible Punditry, capitalist style [300 words]Barry GottesmanMay 7, 2002 13:28
⇒ No Historical Reconcilliation Until Arafat is Out [465 words]Natalie HassmanMay 7, 2002 05:39
Seeds of hope [19 words]Muhammad SiddiquiMay 7, 2002 03:11
So what's the next move? [251 words]Sally VeeMay 7, 2002 02:30
Relinquish the Right of Return [216 words]Ron FinkelMay 7, 2002 02:28
Pertinent analysis, wishful conclusion [285 words]Victor TordjmanMay 7, 2002 01:27
Action Pays Off! [236 words]William J. SturmMay 7, 2002 00:26
The Peace Process Fantasy [154 words]Lawrence KammMay 6, 2002 20:35
Liars Never Win! [588 words]Les LiebermanMay 6, 2002 20:20
Counterproductive Arafat [53 words]Aram PaquinMay 6, 2002 17:55
Seeds of hope? [457 words]Yehudit HirschMay 6, 2002 17:43
Seeds of Hope Will Turn Out to be Pits [165 words]Steven HessMay 6, 2002 17:35
Call it the 'Oslo War' [106 words]Elisa SilvermanMay 6, 2002 17:08
Suicide bombings will lead to total defeat [126 words]Mirko BodulMay 6, 2002 16:56
Americans & Brits aren't jailers any more [170 words]Don MintzMay 6, 2002 16:55

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page