2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

How CNN reacted to the Jihadi attack in NYC

Reader comment on item: The Jihadi Truck Attack in New York City

Submitted by Prashant, Nov 4, 2017 at 09:10

Dear Dr Pipes,

Media's bias in reporting the terrorist attacks and Jihadi terror politics is much talked about. Analyzing how CNN reported on the truck attack in NYC will be instructive in this respect. Here is what I noticed about the CNN's reporting:

-- Almost every day since Donald Trump's election as the president of the US, CNN published one or more articles maligning his character or policies.

-- On Oct 31 after the truck attack CNN reported about the attack in a manner as if they were reporting about an earthquake about which no one can do anything. They completely ignored the fact that media's consistent pattern of explaining away the violence in the name of Islam may be playing some part in encouraging this kind of attacks.

-- On Nov 2 CNN declared in bold face and large fonts that 'New Yorkers were defiant' in the aftermath of the attack.

-- On November 3, CNN returned to the regularly scheduled programming which included a report about how Trump recklessly endangers the prosecution of a terrorism case and how Trump is encouraging democratic women to run in elections and three or four anti-Trump articles.

-- On November 4, there are about 6 articles on cnn.com criticizing Trump. One article about the Jihadi attack. And no article criticizing Islamists violence. I am pretty sure in the next two weeks some profound academic scholar will write an article on CNN criticizing Israel and explaining away the Palestinian and Islamic violence.

Media, the world over, must criticize the Islamists' violence in no uncertain terms and without any if and/or buts. Or else they are complicit in this kind of violence.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1Wajahat Ali of the NYT needs to stick to Urdu Part Two [94 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
dhimmi no moreNov 7, 2017 16:31241255
1Never trust translations from Arabic to English and al-Tabrir explained [690 words]dhimmi no moreNov 14, 2017 14:45241255
1Here is another blatant lie in translations from Arabic to English: صلى الله عليه وسلم [93 words]dhimmi no moreNov 14, 2017 16:15241255
1More evidence that the word Akbar means bigger [137 words]dhimmi no moreNov 15, 2017 09:08241255
More evidence from the Qur'an that the word Akbar means: Bigger! And al-Tabari in his own words! [253 words]dhimmi no moreJul 6, 2018 13:13241255
2How CNN reacted to the Jihadi attack in NYC [278 words]PrashantNov 4, 2017 09:10241224
1Mullah Jake Tapper Sala Allahu 'Alyhi wa Salam [201 words]dhimmi no moreNov 7, 2017 10:33241224
1Wajahat Ali of the NYT needs to stick to Urdu [553 words]dhimmi no moreNov 7, 2017 11:19241224
1Form of Islam or component of Islam? [72 words]JodieNov 2, 2017 14:40241213
2Islam is not just against Jews and Christians/westerners [106 words]PrashantNov 5, 2017 11:51241213
2Ayaan Hirsi Ali [76 words]dhimmi no moreNov 2, 2017 07:14241206
result, and why [5 words]danNov 2, 2017 03:00241200
1He was not a good Muslim [31 words]PrashantNov 1, 2017 23:27241198
2There are doctrines in Islam that inspire such atrocity [57 words]dhimmi no moreNov 1, 2017 11:21241197
I favor radicalization* [269 words]Michael SNov 3, 2017 19:22241197
1"Moderate" Muslims? [104 words]dhimmi no moreNov 7, 2017 10:11241197
1His name? It is The Sword of Allah! [272 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
dhimmi no moreNov 1, 2017 11:00241196
Is it time to ban kitchen knives and rental trucks? [84 words]Michael SNov 1, 2017 06:31241194

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to How CNN reacted to the Jihadi attack in NYC by Prashant

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)