22 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Pipes on the "moderate" Aga Khan

Reader comment on item: Why Chris Christie Will Never Be President of the United States
in response to reader comment: Pamela Geller's attack on Rick Perry

Submitted by Hesperado (United States), Aug 31, 2011 at 15:34

Pipes writes:

"the Aga Khan (the leader of one of the most peaceful of today's Muslim sects, the Ismailis)..."

and:

"The Aga Khan is a leading anti-Islamist figure..."

However, some ordinary person, in the comments field of another blog, who is not a vaunted expert on Islam as is Mr. Pipes easily found the following interview with the Aga Khan that raises legitimate suspicions about his "moderateness", and that ordinary person who is not an expert as is Mr. Pipes presents the findings of that Aga Khan interview with appropriate commentary:

First here is the link to the interview:

http://tinyurl.com/yyz8r9

Now, here is the informative commentary by that ordinary person who is not an expert as is Mr. Pipes:

He [the Aga Khan] begins the interview attacking the Pope for a lecture he gave in which he quoted some statements by Byzantine Emperor Manuel, which were negative on Islam. He takes the Pope to task not on whether the statements represented factual historical record, but because they caused "great unhappiness in the Islamic world." The Khan goes on to describe the period of history during which the newly emergent Islamic entity existed alongside Byzantium as a period "of extraordinary theological exchanges and debates between the Byzantine Empire and the Muslim world." No. Actually, that was a period of incessant violent warfare committed by the muslims against Byzantium that only ended with that city's fall to the Turks in fifteenth century. That's what's known as an attempt at whitewash.

The interviewer continues by asking the Khan if Islam has a problem with reason. The Khan responds by asserting that "Of the Abrahamic faiths, Islam is probably the one that places the greatest emphasis on knowledge...Islam is a faith of reason." Okay, so apart from being a complete bullshitter, we can see clearly this is not a man dedicated to Pluralism- he's an outright partizan for Islam.

Spiegel goes on to ask the Khan about the root causes of terrorism. Khan responds by citing "Unsolved political conflicts, frustration and, above all, ignorance. Nothing that was born out of a theological conflict." LOL! Haven't heard that one before. Not in any Koranic exhortations to violence against the unbelievers, you understand- just damned ignorance! He then dissembles with the usual "all religions have been violent at one time or another" and finishes on the subject by asserting that Islam specifically has never called for violence- "...it is a faith of peace.".This is a flat-out demonstrable, thru the teeth bald-faced lie. The man's a snake.

He attacks Samuel Huntington for his book The Clash of Civilizations and the "dangerous ignorance" that work displayed. And then went on about there not being a "clash of civilizations", but a "clash of ignorance".

Here's the true insight into the character and mind of the Khan- when asked by Spiegel which side was responsible for that clash, Khan responds by saying-

"Both. But essentially the Western world."

"Both", that's the Pluralist talking. Feigning even-handedness. But after that pathetic attempt at seeming objective and non-judgmental, he goes on to lay the blame squarely at the feet of the West. We see here, the Khan showing his true face- the devotee and partizan for Islam. Like all classic Islamist liars, he'll show the false face of moderation here, and his true face Islamic face there. He really thinks we're too stupid to see through his act. Well, it would seem that Rick Perry is.

When asked about the compatibility of Islam with Democracy, he answers by saying his Democratic beliefs don't trace back to the French or the Greeks, "...but to an era 1,400 years ago." And begins going off about the Prophet(PBUH) blah blah blah. He goes on to attack Bush for Iraq, assures the interviewer that he's in regular contact with the leaders of Iran, and then pushes for the normalization of Hamas, as they just need a chance to moderate.

This is an interview that could have been given by Tariq Ramadan, or Imam Ralph or Ibe Hooper or any one of the other notorious stealth Islamist creeps. Anyone here still care to defend this guy?

It's case closed on the Khan. The question is now- wtf was Rick Perry thinking in hooking up with this guy?

[END QUOTE]

**************

...


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Submitting....

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (104) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Christie's benefit from supporting Islamic causes [284 words]PrashantMay 10, 2014 12:09214772
Chris Christie is his own worst enemy [53 words]dhimmi no moreMar 31, 2014 07:20214156
Sometimes it's the simple things [70 words]Dan SchwartzJan 8, 2014 16:54212527
no comments in response to 8 "updates" since 9/30/12, the last on 8/7/13?! [6 words]dcdocAug 18, 2013 19:08209068
Support Freedom [77 words]DanSep 30, 2012 21:39199313
Focus on the facts, not physical issues [126 words]stranchanJun 28, 2012 04:07196777
2Christie cannot be trusted re islamic lunacy [87 words]Domenic PepeApr 5, 2012 10:28194989
1Christie as VP? [31 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
scullyMar 21, 2012 15:47194622
2Puzzling stance [73 words]saraMar 18, 2012 19:49194497
1More dangerous than islamists.... [14 words]car313Oct 11, 2011 02:48189960
Vote bank politicians are indeed very dangerous [22 words]PrashantOct 12, 2011 22:49189960
They Still Want Him To Jump In The Race [39 words]Mark DSep 12, 2011 00:22189280
Christie will never be nominated to be US President [148 words]Isaac FlaksAug 22, 2011 08:35188598
1Candidates for President of the US 2012 elections [282 words]Isaac FlaksAug 21, 2011 06:08188527
Allen West? [47 words]DianeAug 24, 2011 21:02188527
Two Words [2 words]Geno M.Oct 18, 2011 22:40188527
Courtly garb [29 words]Mark McAndrewAug 18, 2011 10:01188481
1Sharia law in American courts [22 words]G. DyerAug 17, 2011 12:49188463
baby with bathwater [157 words]michael hayutinAug 12, 2011 14:59188333
Unfit For Higher Office [47 words]Mark D.Aug 13, 2011 19:09188333
1Sharia vs Religious Arbitration [135 words]JimmyAug 12, 2011 13:16188332
Private contracts based on Sharia [75 words]PrashantAug 12, 2011 20:43188332
I Need An Answer For This Post [151 words]Mark D.Aug 13, 2011 19:13188332
1Chris Chrisie blew it big time [41 words]JoubinAug 11, 2011 22:37188310
Chris Christie Sells His Soul to the Hightest Bidders To Gain The Governorship [116 words]Renee BouvierSep 9, 2011 19:03188310
Media [58 words]Mark D.Aug 11, 2011 22:00188304
Vote [57 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mark D.Aug 10, 2011 22:02188279
Voting For Christie [33 words]Mark D.Aug 11, 2011 22:05188279
Republican Jews of New Jersey Voting for Christie A Second Time Around? [96 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Renee BouvierSep 9, 2011 19:11188279
90 to 95% of NJ Republicans Will Vote For Him, But... [47 words]Mark D.Sep 12, 2011 00:09188279
... out of context [87 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
BroughInCTAug 10, 2011 18:44188264
8Pamela Geller's attack on Rick Perry [187 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
lucretiusAug 15, 2011 06:01188264
3Pipes on the "moderate" Aga Khan [713 words]HesperadoAug 31, 2011 15:34188264
Norquist and Aga Khan [155 words]Ron EdgeSep 3, 2011 10:33188264
anti-Islamism vs Islamophobia [1109 words]lucretiusSep 4, 2011 05:50188264
One slight correction to my previous comment [43 words]HesperadoSep 4, 2011 18:49188264
I agree and I am baffled by Pipes and many "Conservatives" on this issue [76 words]HesperadoSep 4, 2011 18:55188264
More on Geller and Spencer [127 words]lucretiusSep 6, 2011 01:50188264
another response to Pamela Geller [691 words]lucretiusSep 10, 2011 13:03188264
Look behind the curtain [419 words]zaneSep 18, 2011 16:36188264
Why Chris Christie will never be President of the United States. He definitely Blew it! [60 words]AnneAug 10, 2011 08:58188257
Christie will never be President (?) [24 words]Jules PostenAug 9, 2011 19:54188233
Sorry, Gov. Christie [37 words]lee rainesAug 9, 2011 19:14188232
Christie [29 words]Dave WeinbaumAug 9, 2011 17:50188231
Somthing rotten in the state of NJ [212 words]Peter HerzAug 9, 2011 15:58188230
This is what Chris Christie is defendng [42 words]Louise M. SmithAug 9, 2011 13:02188225
Christie's comments [83 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
MalbuffAug 9, 2011 08:36188217
2Sharia Law is a non issue [23 words]SCAug 8, 2011 12:41188203
Soothsayer in our midst [5 words]aspaciaAug 9, 2011 11:53188203
Moving On With Sharia [52 words]Mark D.Aug 13, 2011 19:26188203
1Its the economy (not Sharia). [14 words]Looking CloselyAug 8, 2011 11:38188200
New Jersey [57 words]Mark D.Aug 11, 2011 22:19188200
1The guy is too tempermental and too loose with the truth- look at what he did to Bret Schundler [48 words]David AndersonAug 8, 2011 08:40188193
Marginally Controllable Temper [41 words]Mark D.Aug 11, 2011 22:28188193
3Has Sohail Mohammed ever ruled in a way... [49 words]ChungAug 8, 2011 08:24188192
There is a problem with this Imam. [14 words]aspaciaAug 9, 2011 11:58188192
he's cracking up [35 words]97tr9o7iukjchxAug 8, 2011 07:32188191
4Gov. Christie [29 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Connecticut LawyerAug 8, 2011 06:36188189
1always more yings than yangs [48 words]egoistAug 8, 2011 06:31188188
1Who was the judge? [38 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Seven MachosAug 8, 2011 00:39188183
Well then what's the issue? [48 words]Seven MachosAug 8, 2011 21:59188183
2His other Achilles Heel [9 words]Gary S.Aug 7, 2011 23:54188181
3BIG BRAIN [116 words]VEERESHAug 7, 2011 22:24188179
1Saw It [19 words]Mark D.Aug 7, 2011 18:57188171
Fifth Column advances [16 words]aspaciaAug 7, 2011 14:39188161
GOVERNOR, GET A GRIP!!! [42 words]Lovey in Las VegasAug 7, 2011 12:18188157
3Sharia Law appointee [92 words]margaret metcalfAug 7, 2011 11:21188154
3Open mouth, insert foot [128 words]Rebecca MouldsAug 7, 2011 10:14188152
2To those misguided conservatives [54 words]Yossi bar NegevAug 7, 2011 05:51188144
4All this "crap" [128 words]Michael the KAug 7, 2011 05:25188142
The Arab World in the papers [50 words]Mark D.Aug 13, 2011 20:55188142
2Ecumenical Jihad [102 words]Martien PenningsAug 7, 2011 01:23188139
Alliance With Muslims [40 words]Mark D.Aug 11, 2011 22:12188139
Another one bites the dust [124 words]SusanAug 7, 2011 01:10188138
3Christie will lose supporters [51 words]KathyAug 6, 2011 23:59188136
1Christie, we must not allow our country to be the United States of Americastan [120 words]NuritGAug 6, 2011 22:56188133
Excellent point -- Support or antipathy for Sharia IS THE TRUE LITMUS TEST! [301 words]GWKAug 6, 2011 22:47188132
Unhappy with Chris Christie [63 words]AlanAug 6, 2011 22:16188130
Sharia Law [200 words]Richard M. PiousAug 6, 2011 21:40188129
Follow the money? [27 words]LarryAug 6, 2011 21:06188127
8Misinterpretation [66 words]Pat BenjaminAug 6, 2011 19:42188123
It is a question of judgement [9 words]aspaciaAug 7, 2011 14:41188123
2Separation of Church and State [68 words]Mark D.Aug 6, 2011 15:33188118
11'Crazies' [84 words]NickAug 6, 2011 08:18188109
Deficit more imminent threat than Sharia [234 words]John in Michigan, USAAug 6, 2011 21:34188109
1Christie is off on this one [15 words]aspaciaAug 7, 2011 14:43188109
reply to UK [155 words]Bob - USAAug 7, 2011 16:11188109
Response [136 words]NickAug 11, 2011 19:11188109
8Big Mouth, Small Brain [73 words]jdAug 6, 2011 07:47188107
Big mouth small brain [73 words]saigarjeAug 7, 2011 22:01188107
2Christie has several Achilles heels [57 words]AlistairAug 8, 2011 09:13188107
Two things [63 words]gorgoAug 8, 2011 09:42188107
9Sharia Law [65 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mark D.Aug 6, 2011 00:07188095
Creeping Sharia [62 words]aspaciaAug 7, 2011 14:47188095
Conservative vs Neoconservative [79 words]fuzzfaceAug 9, 2011 14:53188095
1Christie ... [19 words]Mark D.Aug 5, 2011 23:55188094
Christie [14 words]Mark D.Aug 5, 2011 23:51188093
1Unbelieveable [18 words]JACOBAug 6, 2011 22:19188093
1I agree with Dr. Pipes [137 words]Fred WeissAug 7, 2011 03:47188093
neoMcCarthyism [83 words]ameer_r2Aug 7, 2011 06:32188093
1Out of the race even if he wasn't in it. [41 words]JALAug 8, 2011 00:47188093
1Gun grabber [28 words]CCAug 8, 2011 08:42188093
Republicans Incredibly Stupid? [45 words]Mark D.Aug 8, 2011 19:47188093
McCarthy [13 words]Mark D.Aug 10, 2011 22:14188093

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2014 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes