|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Response to Vivi Andreson's commentReader comment on item: [Hamid Dabashi:] Columbia University's Hysterical Professor Submitted by Sid Badakhsh (United States), Dec 3, 2004 at 23:18 My comment is not on this article but on the comment posted by Vivi Andersen regarding Van Gogh incident and Islam. As unfortunate and horrifying this incident was, I like to think that Ms. Anderson would agree that as valid it is to criticize the Islamic treatment of women, it would have been much more logical for Mr. Van Gough to criticize the ongoing slavery of women as young as 13 years old in Mr. Van Gogh's back yard of Amsterdam.Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||