1 readers online now  |  69 million page views
Join Daniel Pipes' trip to Dubai & Abu Dhabi, Nov. 4-11. Click HERE for details.

SLANDER

Reader comment on item: [Hamid Dabashi:] Columbia University's Hysterical Professor
in response to reader comment: Columbia University Hysterical Professor is Behaving Predictibly

Submitted by YOUSUF GABREIL (Pakistan), Aug 25, 2009 at 03:14

THE BACKBITING DEFAMING --AND ITS RESULTS

By Allama Muhamamd Yousuf Gabriel

Idara Tasnifate Gabriel, Main Bazar Nawab abad Wah Cantt

The causes of the punishment of Al-Hotama according to the Quran are as follows:-

"Woe to every backbiter, defamer, who amasseth wealth (of this world) and arrangement it (against the future). He thinketh that his wealth will render him immortal. Nay, for, verily he will be cast into Al-Hotama".

(Quran-Al-Homaza-104).

The following thus are the causes of the punishment of Al-Hotama:-

1. Backbiting and defaming.

2. Engrossment in the accumulation of wealth of this world in a continuous, systematic manner.

3. Belief in the eternity of this life.

That is, so deep an interest in the life of this world as to consider it eternal and to think that the riches will go on increasing for ever.

These are then, and very unfortunately indeed, the exact causes of the appearance of the atomic hell in this world. Backbiting and defaming indeed are the terms that are not every likable but the fact indeed is that these qualities that appear to us so very ugly and indeed so very loathsome do constitute the basic spirit of the philosophy of atomism that is the philosophy of this age, and therefore of this otherwise very enlightened age. The difference only is that the knowledge and the intelligence have imparted to the evil of slander a sophisticated and intellectual cast and thus it is that the world propaganda which in the premodern ages meant propagation and publicity IN this age assumed a peculiar meaning that implies slander, though intellectual slander. The critical attitude of rationalism too may be seen to have been tainted with calumny.

As far as the question of the engrossment in the pursuit of wealth accumulation is concerned there could be no two opinions that this modern age is the age of wealth accumulation. According to the scheme of the modern philosophy man has to obtain the dominion over nature for material benefit and physical comforts. Leaving aside the philosophical implications, just see around you in the entire world, and then see if anyone anywhere has any interest other than the acquirement and accumulation of wealth. Wealth is the soul, the spirit, the life and every thing in this age.

And lastly as far as the question of considering this life eternal and increasing the riches in a systematic, continuous, infinite and eternal manner is concerned, not much thinking, and not much acute observation is required to know that every effort and all endeavor is directed toward making this life perpetual by means of strong enduring buildings, factories, concerns and other monuments of science. One look on the modern science-guided, machine-ridden, systematic, continuous, infinite eternal progress for self-sufficiency shows clearly that it is the effort to perpetuate this life and keep the riches increasing to the utmost achievable limits. The solicitude in the durability of material works shows the hope for ever living in this world.

Without any fear of contradiction the following signs of the Quran may be cited as applicable to this modern age of atomism:-

"Woe to every backbiter, defamer, who amasseth the wealth (of this world) and arrangeth it (against the future). he thinketh that his wealth will render him immortal. Nay, for verily he shall be cast into Al-Hotama".

And it means that even if the people of this age escape the

Punishment of the atomic hell of this world, they fulfill all the conditions of the Hotama of f the next world. To escape the atomic hazard, however, the causes have to be removed. Are not the causes clearly given by the Quran?

The Quran says" Verily he will be cast into Al-Hotama". The atomic hell is the scientific and logical consequence of the three evils referred to by the Quran as the cause of the appearance of Al-Hotama. The Atomic fire appeared as a result of a systematic and continuous process of scientific researches with the object exclusively of material gain and man's dominion over the natural forces. Like the three ingredients of gunpowder, when these three evils become mixed, the result is atomic hell. It is these same three evils that will now sustain the existence of atomic hell, despite man's knowledge of the grievous hazards that are imminent. The Quran has more than once correlated the wealth of this world with fire. They who devour the substance of the orphan wrongly they devour the fire in their stomachs, says the Quran, and that the accumulated gold and silver not spent in the name of Allah will be heated in the fire of hell, and the faces, the backs and the flanks of such accumulators shall be branded therewith. And also that they whose exclusive pursuit in this world is the pursuit of this world, for such there is nothing in the other world except the fire. Very unfortunately, however, the pursuit of the world in this age according to the modern philosophy of atomism is not merely a pursuit; it is the main object of man. And more unfortunately still the followers of religions like Christianity, Islam and Hinduism have cleared their conscience by the notion that their religion did allow such a pursuit. Some have said that their religion encouraged such pursuits. While others have said that the material achievements of this modern science were the exact aim of their religion and they add that their forefathers in this respect erred and showed no interest therein while certain other nations adopted the path of progress and went too far toward the destination that of self-sufficiency. Now, however, the situation is crystal clear. The modern material progress is there and its result the atomic hell is there ready to consume all that their science achieved during the past several centuries, and to consume along with their achievements their own lives, and it may happen any moment. Only such as are blinded by the influence of the doom may overlook these possibilities. This world, however, at present plays the blind and ostriching.

Allama Muhammad Yousuf Gabriel

Adara Afqar e Gabriel QA St. Nawababad wah cantt distt Rawalpindi Pakistan

www.oqasa.org

yousuf_gabriel@yahoo.com


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (68) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
2about Hamid Dabashi: Columbia University's Hysterical Professor [174 words]AllenNov 30, 2012 14:37201079
Self-delusion and confusion [265 words]Borzooyeh ZendigSep 25, 2007 01:52109619
Nut job [19 words]TomAug 7, 2007 10:08105619
Freedom of speech!! [49 words]BradJul 15, 2007 07:27103704
you ruined iran [236 words]somebodyDec 6, 2005 20:0729550
"somebody" ... [49 words]NimaJan 20, 2007 16:0329550
What Arab? [46 words]Matthew SteinbergMay 4, 2005 08:2421986
Madness [48 words]Paul JacksonJan 31, 2005 05:1520011
Hysterical! [16 words]DenniswJan 18, 2005 06:1219717
1Liberalism is a Mental Disorder [213 words]Jer ValentineJan 7, 2005 08:1219497
1EUROSTAN [125 words]DONVANDec 27, 2004 12:4319140
Left-wing institutions [8 words]Octavio JohansonDec 23, 2004 19:0219123
Political Correctness Gone Mad [54 words]Octavio JohansonDec 21, 2004 08:1819059
1british welcome islamification [90 words]steve omaraNov 30, 2011 13:3119059
This is unbelievable [112 words]KarimDec 14, 2004 16:4418992
Response to Sid [62 words]BrutusDec 13, 2004 04:1618970
Why is that Arabs are never the object of the critique? [84 words]IgnacioDec 7, 2004 18:2218915
reason why muslims are not criticised [18 words]steve omaraDec 1, 2011 16:5118915
2Mr Dabashi's factual errors [398 words]J SchamrothDec 7, 2004 06:0918890
Re: comment "A pox on both houses." [185 words]JohnDec 6, 2004 14:1018880
Shame on Columbia University [87 words]Brian Gold, Esq.Dec 6, 2004 11:4918876
A pox on both houses [614 words]Irfan KhawajaDec 5, 2004 13:2218864
Columbia University's Hysterical Professor [117 words]Marcia PetersDec 5, 2004 10:1518863
Empty vessels make the loudest noise. [5 words]BradDec 4, 2004 12:0818855
Dabashi, a dangerous paranoid professor [47 words]Molly KafesDec 4, 2004 07:2218852
The antiracist racism [269 words]R. HARANDIANDec 3, 2004 23:2718846
Response to Vivi Andreson's comment [81 words]Sid BadakhshDec 3, 2004 23:1818845
It's very simple really [51 words]ReportDec 3, 2004 20:1818843
Response to Nima [360 words]Victor LuriaDec 3, 2004 19:3318842
Debating An Islamist [80 words]ReportDec 3, 2004 19:1918840
The professor's harassment claims seem disingenuous [365 words]Yoel NatanDec 2, 2004 19:1618831
The usual tactic [95 words]Doug GuilloryDec 2, 2004 18:2418830
Security vs Morality [54 words]JohnDec 2, 2004 16:4618828
The truth? [141 words]NimaDec 2, 2004 15:0818824
Hypocrite [28 words]Emad NekooDec 2, 2004 14:4518822
boundaries of academic freedom [437 words]Michael Weiss, M.D.Dec 2, 2004 14:2318821
3Iranian are not Persian and Iran is not Persia [210 words]Hayden AtauneDec 2, 2004 13:4218820
real persians are kurds? [8 words]vsbFeb 18, 2010 20:4018820
totally agree with you [26 words]samFeb 26, 2012 01:2818820
Contact Information [156 words]S. BrownDec 2, 2004 11:3518817
1Columbia University Hysterical Professor is Behaving Predictibly [2813 words]William GawthropDec 2, 2004 07:1818815
1SLANDER [1027 words]YOUSUF GABREILAug 25, 2009 03:1418815
Revolting Remarks [155 words]Marcos BerensteinDec 2, 2004 06:3118813
If Dr Dabashi were a politician? [242 words]Romesh ChanderDec 2, 2004 03:4618812
Love? [236 words]JohnDec 2, 2004 02:0718811
MISUSE OF UNIVERSITY CACHET [326 words]IVAN CHERDec 2, 2004 01:4418810
Hamid Dabashi. evidence of an Arab Coward [65 words]David La RochelleDec 2, 2004 01:3218809
The Iranian Hysterical Professor [114 words]M.J.Dec 1, 2004 22:3418808
The Mouse Who Roared [65 words]Marilyn AbramovitzDec 1, 2004 20:5118805
The poor little professor [202 words]Arlinda DeAngelisDec 1, 2004 20:1518804
How could people send their children to Columbia? [54 words]Sarah CiprianoDec 1, 2004 20:0618803
Did I Miss Something? [106 words]YonasonDec 1, 2004 18:0918802
Dabashi an Arab? [55 words]Allen BatesDec 1, 2004 17:4418799
2Entire critique [87 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Sidney Klawansky, M.D., Ph.D.Dec 1, 2004 17:1818797
This Website [64 words]FTNov 5, 2009 16:3318797
Mr Dabashi is an Islamist. [19 words]RezaJul 16, 2013 21:2518797
Hardly surprising! [70 words]Darwin BarrettDec 1, 2004 15:5718795
Support [39 words]Howard J SchwartzDec 1, 2004 12:4618791
Dabashi the Moslemite [17 words]John PatterkDec 1, 2004 12:2518790
Columbia U. [27 words]Kermit J. Halperin, D.D.S.Dec 1, 2004 10:3118786
Dabashi's cowardice [159 words]Bob CoppsDec 1, 2004 10:1018785
Dethroning Dabashi [135 words]Carmen Waggoner, Ph.D.Dec 1, 2004 10:0318784
Follow the Money [49 words]Abraham IrwinDec 1, 2004 09:0318783
When a man has no moral compunction about telling a lie [153 words]V. ThogersenDec 1, 2004 08:5918782
Dabashi doeth protest too much [64 words]Herbert J. Nevyas, MDDec 1, 2004 08:4318781
There's Method to Hamid's madness - Basic Manipulation [93 words]RPaineDec 1, 2004 08:3618780
Arab hysteria can be hysterical [179 words]Ken BesigDec 1, 2004 07:5818779
Take a look... [58 words]vivi andersenDec 1, 2004 07:3218778

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2017 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes