7 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Counter Rushdie's Rules

Reader comment on item: Two Decades of the Rushdie Rules

Submitted by Lawrence Daniel (Iraq), Sep 30, 2010 at 13:54

Let me begin my participation with trying to answer your question: will Westerners maintain their own historic civilization in the face of assault by islamist, or will they cede to Islamic culture and law and submit to a form of second-class citizenship?

To answer adequately to your question we need first to point out what the muslim individual go through in his home country in counter to what he sees in a western community and I will begin with the freedom of expression.

None of the so called muslim countries allow freedom of expression in the so called muslim world (by the way all these appellations are created by westerners and can easily by transformed into other names derived from historical facts)/ So when a muslim arrives to a western country, he is stunned by the freedom pattern of life the westerners enjoy due to their secular governing system and the implementation of human rights up to a certain level, so he starts penetrating the western life by adopting some of its humanitarian treatment exhibited towards each person,

Meanwhile, and as a result of this freedom, he starts implementing his own Islamic ideas in his surroundings be them his neighbors or his colleagues using snake cunning approaching methods by showing how good islam is and how filthy the way of the westerns' life is benefiting from the freedom of expression and the freedom of speech from which he was deprived in his own Islamic country, so, who is to blame, the muslim?

Of course not, it's the system of immigration that allowed to the muslim to migrated without any code of conduct signed document by the muslim in which his duties and responsibilities are outlined clearly, so one of the issues that each and every muslim, woman or man, must engage her/him self to is a" code of conduct" derived from the constitution of the western country and this code of conduct must include severe consequences up to deportation and confiscation of property should she or he deviate from the code of conduct.

With that said, I can tell from the way western countries are dealing with their muslim communities will lead very soon to answer you included yourself in your above question: westerners will cede to the islamic law and culture should the western countries will not imply what I call Counter Rushdie Rules:

Rule number 1: more public disrespectfulness to the muslims sacred topics using all elements possible be they books, TV shows, Articles, Drawings…etc

Rule number 2: declaring war on the muslim cultural infrastructure by displaying the ugly teachings of islam about woman, mohammad's private shameful sexual life and the life of his fellow caliphates…abu bakir, omar, uthman and ali.

Rule number 3: total isolation of muslims in the western communities, mocking the way of their life publicly starting from Kindergartens reaching the highest levels of teaching.

Rule number 4: nourishing education curriculums with real stories about the darkness of islam in regards of woman rights, child abuse, beating women should they refuse to have sex with their husbands, homosexuality (a muslim can and is lawful in the Koran for him to have sex with his wife from her butt), sex in muslim janna (paradise), the ridiculous teaching about entering the toilet with their right foot and eating their meals using the right hand only for the left hand usage is satanic act.

Westerns need not to be afraid of muslims, muslims are very clear with their message to the world, be muslim or die, the west, likewise, must be very clear with his message also with muslims, be respectful or beat it.

We all remember the Australian muslim leader who compared uncovered Australian Women to exposed meat and let me quote his exact words taken from guardian.co.uk electronic copy, he said: "If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside ... without cover, and the cats come to eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats' or the uncovered meat's? The uncovered meat is the problem. If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab [the headdress worn by some Muslim women], no problem would have occurred." Not only he was giving the right to muslim stallions to rape Australian women but he was preaching islam, for when he says that if the woman was in her hijab" the headdress worn by some muslim women" it gives the impression that whole Australia must convert to islam and change the way of their day to day life, the same sheikh would have never dared to say anyting if he was living in own islamic country….what did the Australian Government do? Some shy carry outs of no siginificant consequences or even punishment, why? Because of the so called freedom of expression and human rights and that wsterners can live with but again a 'code of conduct" signed by each and every single muslim ...

Lwarence Daniel


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (69) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
The Satanic verses or الايات الشيطانية and Prince Charles [272 words]dhimmi no moreMay 18, 2014 08:39214872
At least Rushdie didn't suffer being persecuted by his own government [84 words]someoneSep 15, 2012 18:06198699
1Why the pot shot at environmentalism? [104 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
JackJan 6, 2011 18:49181615
stewart [63 words]gemNov 12, 2010 12:26180098
2Free Speech Is "Hate Speech" [822 words]Fred BaehrNov 5, 2010 17:53179953
1lets get them out [8 words]Reuben GoldbergOct 20, 2010 18:18179491
1Primitive tribes should be thrown out of civilized world [160 words]Muslimk***Nov 10, 2010 04:04179491
Rushdie Rules [105 words]Sir Daniel M.J. TobinOct 18, 2010 14:09179390
Defining God [74 words]JoeOct 18, 2010 03:47179381
7Biggest and oldest mafia [153 words]B.N.GururajOct 10, 2010 10:44179141
a bit more than that [13 words]gemOct 15, 2010 01:55179141
Mafia [82 words]AnnaNov 6, 2010 06:38179141
5Rethinking political correctness [117 words]Rebecca MouldsOct 5, 2010 12:48178991
1Standing up to Islam [26 words]RobertoOct 10, 2010 19:12178991
i agree [68 words]mariahNov 14, 2010 02:51178991
House of Ishmael [29 words]Einah TebOct 5, 2010 09:34178981
I Second The Motion [82 words]FroikeOct 8, 2010 09:23178981
1Jews in Islamdom [329 words]Erich WiegerOct 10, 2010 19:45178981
2The answer [97 words]MichaelOct 21, 2010 08:06178981
1thanks Michael [218 words]Erich WiegerOct 26, 2010 15:05178981
9A melancholy story [208 words]John W. McGinleyOct 3, 2010 08:55178924
5Wonderful! [333 words]MichaelOct 3, 2010 19:56178924
Suicidal Tendency of Democracy [113 words]B.N.GururajOct 19, 2010 00:50178924
1Michael of Egypt [148 words]DEBORAH THE JUDGEOct 19, 2010 10:10178924
2Thanks [199 words]MichaelOct 20, 2010 07:40178924
12liberals not protecting their own families [201 words]ivyNov 10, 2010 08:25178924
Substitute [49 words]yuval Brandstetter MDOct 3, 2010 05:53178919
1Re: Substitute [146 words]DEBORAH THE JUDGEOct 19, 2010 10:31178919
Europe may not be done [40 words]yuvalOct 20, 2010 09:59178919
5Obama Has Signaled Islamists to Proceed [161 words]Richard RheinerOct 2, 2010 21:49178910
1right now [134 words]mariahOct 4, 2010 15:24178910
1plain to see [28 words]ivyOct 8, 2010 10:15178910
Answer to Right Now [105 words]Richard RheinerOct 9, 2010 17:25178910
not to be sarcastic [28 words]mariahNov 16, 2010 04:13178910
1Get off olf Arab OPEC oil.... [66 words]yudi FOct 2, 2010 19:37178908
3This and that ... [216 words]GetRealOct 2, 2010 09:02178892
76I've always known all this. [228 words]MichaelOct 1, 2010 20:58178880
Are we dhimmis [46 words]aspaciaOct 1, 2010 19:48178878
4What do we pay government for? [115 words]Erich WiegerOct 1, 2010 16:09178875
Sitting pretty [183 words]UgriOct 2, 2010 09:30178875
Pandemonium [77 words]Erich WiegerOct 3, 2010 02:22178875
about protecting us [168 words]ivyOct 16, 2010 11:53178875
2Free Speech [85 words]Lujack SkylarkOct 1, 2010 11:52178865
6It is time to ACT AGAINST ISLAMISM IN AMERICA [377 words]Carmen WaggonerOct 1, 2010 10:23178858
5the satanic verses [157 words]wendykOct 1, 2010 08:19178853
Application of the Rushdie Rule may be a criminal offense [66 words]Wallace Edward BrandOct 1, 2010 08:15178852
Clash of Civilisations? [30 words]NevilleOct 1, 2010 07:08178850
Constitutional Rights [122 words]Stuart SchoenburgOct 1, 2010 06:45178848
2Rules for radicals,Muslim brotherhood, temporary friends ? [35 words]infosifterOct 1, 2010 06:21178846
1Counter Rushdie's Rules [823 words]Lawrence DanielSep 30, 2010 13:54178831
God bless us with big mouths [10 words]mariahSep 30, 2010 03:05178823
saudi outrage [16 words]ivyOct 13, 2010 23:30178823
4The conquest of the West is a work in Progress [374 words]BobSep 29, 2010 11:08178808
3kow towing to a tyrant religion [267 words]Jules PostenSep 28, 2010 13:46178778
4islamism winning the cold war [153 words]mythSep 28, 2010 07:45178769
muslims must stop selling oil in $ [122 words]syed mohammad aliSep 27, 2010 11:39178746
10Switzerland is the West? [394 words]JeffSep 28, 2010 13:17178746
5Muslim oil for the west [141 words]RajeevSep 29, 2010 00:28178746
5agreed [130 words]the Grand Infide of KaffiristanSep 30, 2010 05:46178746
1... (syed mohammad ali) [48 words]RajivSep 30, 2010 16:08178746
1Democracy and islam [120 words]Lawrence DanielOct 2, 2010 12:48178746
racist [437 words]MarcOct 17, 2010 03:49178746
1Oil from OPEC [35 words]MarisaJun 12, 2011 15:12178746
10Don't forget the NJ Transit worker who lost his job [112 words]EdwardSep 27, 2010 10:44178744
2A LAWSUIT ENSUES [17 words]aspaciaOct 1, 2010 19:55178744
You want NJT to bow down in front of NEOCON agenda? [16 words]amirDec 8, 2010 09:12178744
1What neocon agenda? [41 words]JeffDec 13, 2010 13:07178744
woah!!! [11 words]AmirDec 13, 2010 21:11178744
Jewish what? [20 words]JeffDec 20, 2010 12:35178744

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Counter Rushdie's Rules by Lawrence Daniel

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List


eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)