To All

Submitted by Freedom (United States), Mar 8, 2010 at 15:29

If you do not know Edward, I suggest you watch what you are saying. You were not at the trial nor do you know all the facts. One of the most interesting being that the Lead Detective of the case was quoted as saying that he admitted none of the forensic evidence that was left at the crime scene could link Edward to the scene of the crime. He was basically convicted because he used the father's ATM card at numerous banks. I don't know about you, but I do not see how justice was served if the only piece of evidence was no where near the scene of the crime... makes me wonder what else was covered up...

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".