Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

OK, I Have A Few More Minutes After All
Reader comment on item: The Far Right & Jihadis in Alliance
in response to reader comment: Re: Making generalisations and false accusations

Submitted by orange yonason (United States), May 10, 2009 at 02:56

B"H

"I do not think many social democrats or even those to the Left of social democrats would agree with the Nazis' eugenicist programmes, their imperialist-expansionist ambitions, their belief in the superiority of the Aryan race,..."

That's right, you "do not think" which is your whole problem. Please get back to me when you learn how. This is not about you, or what you think. This is about facts, which you avoid like the plague.

"Excuse me one moment whilst I blow my nose."

You need to be more obsessed with facts than your own bodily dysfunctions. And, no, there's no excuse for stooping to puerile insults.

"It should be pointed out that some of the leading critics of communism and Marxism were themselves men of what you would regard as the Left"

Napoleon and the Czar were both Imperialists, but that didn't stop Napoleon from making war against him, so what's your point? Leftists are self-centered and intolerant, even of other Leftists who disagree with them. Another example is that of Hitler and Stalin, who were initially allies, but Hitler betrayed Stalin when it suited him. This is one of the problems with Leftists, they can be counted on to be unreliable, which is why they always fail in the end. In short, your "proof" is sophistry, and a pretty sloppy example of it, at that.

The Nazis were Leftists, period. I bring factual proof. You bring fanciful assertions. Please stop thinking you can rewrite history by the power of your own intellect, because you just don't have the wattage.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (19) on this item

Title By Date
LATEST UPDATE [27 words]orange yonasonJul 10, 2009 13:09
Orange Yonason [138 words]Aymenn JawadJul 16, 2009 06:27
Supplementary Material [10 words]orange yonasonJun 7, 2009 12:23
Re: Failure to Reply to my Responses [12 words]Aymenn JawadJun 13, 2009 06:17
The Failure Of Aymenn Jawad [198 words]orange yonasonJun 14, 2009 18:30
The Failure Of Orange Yonason [359 words]Aymenn JawadJun 16, 2009 12:10
The Failure Is Still Aymenn Jawad's [179 words]orange yonasonJul 3, 2009 16:17
Re: The Failure is Still Orange Yonason's [322 words]Aymenn JawadJul 4, 2009 04:02
It Was Right Under My Nose The Whole Time [132 words]orange yonasonMay 11, 2009 00:37
(neo) - Nazi is NOT Extreme Right [112 words]TopnifeMay 7, 2009 00:47
The Problem With Calling Any Form Of Nazism "Right Wing" [214 words]orange yonasonMay 3, 2009 01:53
Re: The Problem with Calling Any Form of Nazism "Right Wing" [158 words]Aymenn JawadMay 4, 2009 07:10
RE - Making Generalizations, And False Accusations [289 words]orange yonasonMay 6, 2009 12:05
Re: Making generalisations and false accusations [376 words]Aymenn JawadMay 8, 2009 18:50
No Smoke And Mirrrors - Just The Facts [264 words]orange yonasonMay 10, 2009 01:52
⇒ OK, I Have A Few More Minutes After All [261 words]orange yonasonMay 10, 2009 02:56
Re: No Smoke And Mirrors- Just The Facts [322 words]Aymenn JawadMay 12, 2009 03:44
Re: OK, I Have A Few More Minutes After All [224 words]Aymenn JawadMay 12, 2009 05:22
Re: The Far Right and Islamists [205 words]Aymenn JawadMay 2, 2009 16:15

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page