Submitted by donvan(United States), Oct 21, 2008 at 12:47
Ok, Muhammed, here is how this works on planet earth. Religion, education,politics,in fact all social systems are judged on the outcome of the thesis. The thesis of Muhammed is, basically, expand the mythology by any and all means. Threats, intimidation, terrorism, are all ok, so long as you justify it the glory of I'slam. Of course, no one knows what this "I'slam" is, so we judge by the actiona of its advocates. The antithesis is, that the composition of mythologies collectively called "I'slam" is intrinsically detrimental to the human condition. It, "Islam", teaches violence, intolerance, distrust, terrorism and hate. The question is; can this composition mythology "Islam" synthesis into national cultures without the destruction of the nation- state. The answer is, no it cannot
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.