too droll

Submitted by Bronson (Australia), Sep 22, 2008 at 07:30

I think Mr Lott was commenting on the way that the paper proffered the bare minimum form of words of apology with no admission really of their editorial sloppiness. Mr Yusuf would have been involved in that too and his blog indicates he saw nothing wrong with his initial comments but only joined in the apology because it was a sensible thing to do when threatened by Dr Pipes!!! A mimimalist comment on a minimalist apology.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".