To Sir Brian
Reader comment on item: The U.S. Government Builds Mosques and Madrassahs
in response to reader comment: Building madrassas violates the First Amendment Lamont v Woods

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Mar 8, 2008 at 11:46

Dear Sir:

I read the link exposed by Dr. Pipes here, and I'll follow by reading the one exposed by you.

I personally believe that the problem is indeed located much beneath the surface.

If the exposed situation's "ethos", for to say, were unique, meaning that this was the only violation to the Amendments in general, the constitution, the basic principles upon what this country was molded. If this were the only situation going on, then of course the problem would be an easy one to be resolved. But in all social, political and of course economical spheres you see the same cluster. Violations that are exposed and proven, yet perpetuated.

Part of your people, liberals, leftists and sociopath, widely corrupted by Wannabi or simply those called "conservatives" ("Real" Americans), who want indeed ME in general war to continue, want it so for the reason of private contracts and a way to increase their wealth exponentially, for to say again.

Yet, concepts and thousands of interpretation have made the current "adopted" interpretation of the constitution and law of free speech, unacceptably colloidal.

A Liberal judge would dismiss some arguments of yours while a conservative in general will abide to them.

So the problem lies beneath the surface. It is a war in between ideas, those who want to keep things straight and have the US as it was always was, the reality that made the US the most successful nation on the history of Earth, and those creature of darkness, for to say, liberals, leftists and islamists, who want not only to take over the world, but also take it back to the 7th century.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.