| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
by Daniel Pipes
March 6, 2007
updated Mar 7, 2007
| Share: |
![]() Dinesh D'Souza |
|
No one can deny the horror of Palestinian and Chechen attacks on civilians, but these have to be measured against the state-sponsored terror on the other side: the bulldozing of Palestinian homes, the shooting of stone-throwing teenagers, the obliteration of the Chechen capital of Grozny.
Comment: Israeli efforts at self-defense constitutes state-sponsored terrorism? One can dispute the tactics without using such a baseless term. D'Souza has apparently lost his moral compass as much as his common sense. (March 6, 2007)
Mar. 12, 2007 update: Scott W. Johnson points out to me that the above same passage derives word-for-word from D'Souza's book. Indeed, Johnson quoted the sentence in his excellent review, "D'Souza goes native," where he astringintly observed that "even State Department foreign service officers have [not] yet gone quite as native as D'Souza."
Related Topics: Arab-Israeli debate in the U.S., Conservatives & Liberals receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.