Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Dinesh D'Souza Blames the West and secularists for Muslim rage
Reader comment on item: Dinesh D'Souza Walks on the Dark Side

Submitted by Ben van de Polder (United States), Mar 7, 2007 at 20:17

D'Souza says Israel practices state terrorism -and the secularists are to blame for terrorism too!

In addition to going over to the dark side -he has fallen off the deep end.

"Secularism, not Christian fundamentalism, is responsible for producing a blowback of Muslim rage.

This concerned citizen letter is just wacko.

What stands out about the Islamic militant's critique of America is its refreshing clarity. Painful though it is to admit, they aren't entirely wrong. They charge that America is a society obsessed with material gain, and who will deny this? They condemn the West as an atheistic civilization, and while they may be wrong about the extent of religious belief and practice, they are right that in the West religion has little sway over the public arena, and the West seems to have generated more unbelief than any other civilization in world history. They are disgusted by our culture, and we have to acknowledge that there is a good deal in American culture that is disgusting to normal sensibilities. The Islamic militants fear that the idea of America is taking over their young people, breaking down allegiances to parents and religion and traditional community; this concern on their part is also justified.

http://www.dineshdsouza.com/articles/Letfreedomring.html


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (26) on this item

Title By Date
LOVE the gratuitous slam on "foreign service officers" (sic) [19 words]JeffMay 1, 2007 16:36
D'souza [131 words]joshuaApr 10, 2007 17:11
Ahh...D'Souza [157 words]Pro-Israeli DemocratMar 25, 2007 19:22
Response to D'Souza [105 words]DAVID R. GROESBECKMar 19, 2007 04:17
Overfocus on israel results in blinkered vision [82 words]RaviMar 18, 2007 14:18
Where did D'Souza go wrong? [317 words]Dr. M. D'SouzaMar 17, 2007 12:24
On the Dark Side of D'Souza [105 words]dsRonMar 16, 2007 23:19
discovery of zero [100 words]john h. rubelMar 16, 2007 19:02
Zero was an Import from India [27 words]SinghaMar 17, 2007 22:22
To Singhel, Rubel and Zero [150 words]LeeMar 27, 2007 06:51
TOTALLY WRONG [10 words]roopam royJan 2, 2008 02:59
Discovery of Zero [7 words]Dr. Indra MukhopadhyayOct 1, 2008 02:02
who discovered the zero? [19 words]aviral kumar mishra.Feb 13, 2009 22:52
Discovery of Zero... [258 words]MitraSep 10, 2009 07:25
Zero [71 words]MaramSep 23, 2009 19:58
D'Souza in context [43 words]Gideon KannerMar 16, 2007 12:03
D'Souza book [54 words]Dennis GravesMar 16, 2007 11:22
I've read his book... [121 words]JoshuaMar 12, 2007 21:53
Sorry Dr. Pipes, I disagree. [194 words]Brooks ImperialMar 12, 2007 16:42
D'Souza [23 words]JamaMar 19, 2007 14:58
D'Souza plays perverted game of 'good cop' 'bad cop' presents Al Qaeda as having socially redeeming value [319 words]Ben van de PolderMar 8, 2007 09:04
⇒ Dinesh D'Souza Blames the West and secularists for Muslim rage [204 words]Ben van de PolderMar 7, 2007 20:17
Revert? [25 words]DaisyMar 7, 2007 13:49
His dark side? [31 words]surjitMar 17, 2007 18:31
Surjit [65 words]DaisyMar 17, 2007 22:44
D'Souza [79 words]Drs Sears AppalsamyMar 18, 2007 09:15

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page