25 readers online now

Related Topics

 

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Is the road map still relevant?

by Daniel Pipes
Wed, 17 Jan 2007

Print Send Comment RSS Share:    

Question asked of Jerusalem Post columnists: "Do you believe the road map is still relevant? Is there a need for a new plan?" For all replies, see "Burning Issues #21 Is the road map still relevant?"

The question implies that once upon a time, the "concrete, three-phase implementation road map" (as it is more fully known) was relevant. That, however, never was the case. As Yitschak Ben-Gad succinctly summed up the problem in the title of his 2004 book, it was always the "roadmap to nowhere." Or as I counseled in a February 2003 article, Israelis and Americans should hold firm against "road maps that lead exactly in the wrong direction."

The plan was born a bureaucratic monstrosity; of its myriad faults, grown perhaps the most fundamental was its assumption that if only the Palestinians were given just a tad more of this or that, they would finally recognize the benefits of harmonious co-existence with a Jewish state of Israel. Not to have learned by now that Palestinians have larger and more aggressive ambitions than to live side-by-side with Israel implies living in a state of denial.

Due to continued Palestinian violence against Israelis, the road map to nowhere has, fortunately, not been implemented. I don't suppose it ever will be, and I sleep better in that expectation.

And no, there is no need for a new plan. The Bush administration should return to its predecessors' willingness to mediate, facilitate, and fund, and drop its overly-ambitious notions of "solving the Arab-Israeli conflict." As Irving Kristol memorably observed, "Whom the gods would destroy, they first tempt to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict." (January 17, 2007)

Related Topics: Arab-Israel conflict & diplomacy

Trackbacks

Links to weblogs that reference this post.
TrackBack URL for this post: http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/trackback.php/722/3c5a3/833

24 - again
From: In Context
Excerpt: Not really, but bear with me a sec. One of the things that's really starting (to put it mildly) to get on the nerves of......

Reader comments on this weblog entry

Title By Date
ROAD MAP STILL ON SCHEDULE - LIVNI AND PERES SPEAKING IN DAVOS [64 words]nabil shawarmaJan 25, 2007 14:21
The true roadmap [178 words]JoshuaFeb 11, 2007 23:24
roadblock to victory [139 words]lindaJan 25, 2007 01:07
Hillary in 2008? [30 words]Abe LevineJan 23, 2007 13:18
Is the Road Map relevant? [86 words]RaamJan 20, 2007 02:45
Precursors to Peace Twixst Palestine and Israel. [188 words]Frank K. HooverMar 1, 2007 18:19
Conflict mediation and the dangreous cycle [186 words]Asaf GolanJan 19, 2007 07:47
Was the road map ever relevant? [142 words]Michael BJan 19, 2007 03:49
Obstacles to a solution [385 words]Tracy WJan 19, 2007 01:29
No, It's not (And probably never has been) [447 words]Ron ThompsonJan 18, 2007 10:44
Paraphrasing Kristol [31 words]BenjaminJan 18, 2007 08:38
From all, for all [169 words]David W. LincolnJan 18, 2007 01:51
Is the road map still relevant? [95 words]Another AmericanJan 17, 2007 23:39
Appeasement not a roadmap. [191 words]clarence puckettJan 17, 2007 23:38
A road map to never-never land [80 words]Carol SolfronkJan 17, 2007 22:26
Great Temptations [205 words]DrewJan 17, 2007 20:43
Roadmap [217 words]Ernie LofthouseJan 17, 2007 19:48
The road to nowhere [227 words]Guinther SchiffJan 17, 2007 18:08
Roadmap [79 words]Daniel R. BallesterosJan 17, 2007 15:09
Roadmap [7 words]Another AmericanJan 17, 2007 23:55
Any hope of peace with Palestinians is delusional [89 words]h.yazdiJan 18, 2007 18:25
By Their Deeds One Can Know Them [110 words]DavidJan 17, 2007 14:54

Comment on this weblog entry

Name
Email Address (optional)

Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Top 25 recent comments
Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site ©1979-2008 Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com