69 million page views

Anti-CAIR should not have settled this lawsuit

Reader comment on item: CAIR Backs Down from Anti-CAIR

Submitted by Romesh Chander (United States), Apr 21, 2006 at 10:07

After reading the article, I find that CAIR's lawsuit was quite weak. I fail to understand why ANTI-CAIR settled this lawsuit and keep the settlement confidential. They should have gone through the entire discovery process and let everything come into the open.

Yes, it would have cost some more money; but at least, we would have brought into the exact nature of CAIR and its financial backers, which would led to the demise of CAIR. We lost the opportunity to destroy CAIR and other Islamist organizations.

This lawsuit should never have been settled without an open trial.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)