69 million page views

jpost op-ed on NYT minimizing Jewish claim to Temple Mount

Reader comment on item: Did a Conspiracy Theory Just Collapse?
in response to reader comment: An innocent NYT quote that infuriated me.

Submitted by Dave (United States), Aug 19, 2022 at 19:15

In a similar vein to Prashant's criticism, this op-ed in the Jerusalem Post takes the NYT to task for minimizing the Jewish claim to its holiest site, the Temple Mount, in a rather tawdry effort to minimize the gravity of the long-standing Muslim claim to exclusive control over it. Let's not forget that Jews were forbidden access to the site for the 19 years Jordan controlled it, until it was liberated by Israel in the '67 War. Even now, Muslims routinely attack Jewish worshippers there and riot over slanderous rumors of Jewish plots to take it over - clearly a case of psychological projection. Here's the article:
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-714953
Don't get too upset, though. Most journalists tend to be competent writers with only a shallow understanding of the topics they cover, although some are dishonest leftist ideologues. One consequence is that they fall prey to the mirror image fallacy in an effort to be even-handed, or just plain lie.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to jpost op-ed on NYT minimizing Jewish claim to Temple Mount by Dave

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)