69 million page views

Lack of Comparison with Counterintuative Belief System Defeats Analysis

Reader comment on item: Covering Muslims
in response to reader comment: What news from the East?

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Jun 6, 2022 at 16:51

In the final analysis, there will be no ability to define Islam as anything more than what its appearance in the world paradigm was original intended for: replacing the Gospel message of the Jewish Savior and the unfortunate ancillary enmity all the other religious pursuits that have been encountered in history and other societal developments spanning centuries and epochs in mankinds' existence and perceptions of life.
To be exact in that assumption, Islam has made sure of tis legacy by its terminal pusuits in history where replacement theology was not practiced as a philosphical pursuit that argued superiority, but actions spoke louder than words and losing an argument meant more than walking away with hurt feelings.
What is determinable here is that more than life itself, its theoretical basis for human existence is dependent upon the presumed 'greater power' of supernatural cause and effect and the various arguments written in the Quran by its various authors sought that superiority for reasons of not acknowledging the facts of a truth that is antecedent and filled with various proofs of a far superior existence and personality that can ever be expressed in the human terms as found in Islam; and Islamic apologetics know this, but after fourteen hundred years are trying, still feel the need to try. Whether Edward Said, or any of the less than convincing current authors; humanity is depicted as the global victim of a philosophy that seeks in its own attempts of validation that the world would be better off just accepting this ancent premise and allow the decimation of an unbelieving mankind instead of going back to the truth, where the true Savior of the world expressed a love of a Sovereign Almighty that put His will on the line to bring salvation for those who would believe in that kingdom and share that love for eternity.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (13) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Computational topic modeling, and human bias [128 words]PeterJul 19, 2022 16:20283942
1For all you know, Erik Bleich and Maurits van der Veen are right [262 words]PrashantJun 9, 2022 16:19282450
1If you do not like science, just change it [504 words]PrashantJun 13, 2022 16:46282450
1How to get published and be popular? [464 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
PrashantJun 5, 2022 11:56282359
1Does Said's own life debunk his thesis? [432 words]PrashantJun 6, 2022 11:23282359
1Your arguments hold entirely [133 words]JeffJun 7, 2022 21:16282359
1I don't oppose Islam or Muslims; I oppose hypocrisy and selfishness [135 words]PrashantJun 8, 2022 17:13282359
2The dangerous trend today is from... [41 words]GinaJun 8, 2022 19:22282359
1Fully agreed with Gina [63 words]PrashantJun 9, 2022 13:02282359
Just wait [22 words]JeffJun 4, 2022 14:25282344
1More and more teachers and journalists are propageting fake news even in democratic countries. [29 words]Amos ZotJun 4, 2022 04:36282340
What news from the East? [140 words]John HarveyJun 2, 2022 12:23282313
Lack of Comparison with Counterintuative Belief System Defeats Analysis [310 words]M ToveyJun 6, 2022 16:51282313

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)