69 million page views

Number of Muslim "protesters" at Temple Mount does not impress me

Reader comment on item: Jews and the Qur'an
in response to reader comment: Question about "Muslim Zionism"

Submitted by Prashant (United States), May 29, 2022 at 00:55

Dear Dr Pipes,

I am not surprised that 10,000,000 Muslims visit Temple Mount compared to just 40,000 religious Jews. Praying at Temple Mount for Muslims is just a show of political power. In India also Muslims choose to pray at specific places as a show of strength. I am sure any Muslim from any part of the world who visits Jerusalem for any reason will make it a point to visit Temple Mount to enhance the Islamic claim on the place. That is the most prized land that they want to grab at currently, after all.

Historically, Islamic claim on Jerusalem is entirely contrived. As I said in one of my other letters to your forum, Muhammad had his eye on Jerusalem even before he died. In the years prior to his death he instructed his followers to attack Jerusalem. The first Muslim siege of Jerusalem happened within a few years of Muhammad's death. The story of Muhammad's overnight journey to Jerusalem was completely contrived and egotistical (Muhammad did not join other prophets in prayer; he "led" them!!).

Any time, ancient Muslim saw a sacred place important to other cultures, they created events to "grab" that place. Every single sacred place (to Hindu) in India has a Mosque near it and towering it. I would never like Temple Mount to become a Mosque. The world must open their eyes and see Islamic hegemony.

And, regarding Muslim Zionism --even if it is a real thing--, hard core Islamists oppose it (ref 1). The author of this article (Hatem Bazian is considered by some to be the most anti-Semitic prof in America).

ref1: https://medium.com/@Prof.hatembazian/what-is-muslim-zionism-3944ac585c38

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (13) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Question about "Muslim Zionism" [356 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
DavidMay 27, 2022 19:20281967
1Number of Muslim "protesters" at Temple Mount does not impress me [272 words]PrashantMay 29, 2022 00:55281967
reply to reply [400 words]DavidMay 30, 2022 18:05281967
author ignores "powerful revisionism" but the book is still a gem? [54 words]danteApr 29, 2022 14:01280324
3It hardly matters ! [114 words]vcragainApr 28, 2022 15:12280267
2Vcragain said it right [76 words]PrashantApr 28, 2022 23:07280267
Can Muslims accept historically researched differences about Islam? [268 words]DaveMar 15, 2022 14:04279346
Revisionist vs conventional history? [60 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
IgnoramusMar 14, 2022 14:18279336
3Muhammad and the Jews [211 words]dhimmi no moreMar 14, 2022 14:05279335
2627: Muhammad massacred 700 Jews of Medina for refusing to convert to his [177 words]SaulMar 14, 2022 17:37279335
Islam Did Not Replace the Cross - Could Not Replace that Over Which It Does Not Have Power [203 words]M ToveyMar 14, 2022 19:38279335
Why Religious Contentions of the Quran Fail to Quell the Legitimacy of the Torah [87 words]M ToveyMar 14, 2022 13:12279334
1What are your thoughts on Ukraine? [10 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Debanjan BanerjeeMar 14, 2022 01:59279330

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)