69 million page views

more dangerous aspects of Islamism in the USA

Reader comment on item: The Case for Banning Burqas and Niqabs

Submitted by David (United States), May 13, 2022 at 19:28

I have mentioned this in another thread but I will mention this again here. This does not relate directly to the veil etc., but to something more important. I don't think the author has given anywhere near enough attention to the significance of the Biden administration's designation of Qatar as a "non-NATO ally." That vile little country, with its terror sponsoring Al Jazeera propaganda network, is now spreading its tentacles deep into the heart of Washington DC, and it is hard to ignore the reality that this was PRECISELY the intention behind the administration's vile decision. And so I beseech the author to wake up and recognize, that contrary to his opinion a few weeks ago, the Biden administration is not different on these matters than Bernie Sanders, to much effect. It is a Sanders administration with a friendly seeming face. Perhaps even more dangerous as a consequence.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

I addressed your point here: https://twitter.com/DanielPipes/status/1488720329253994497

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (17) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
3Iran's Women's Fashion Revolution? [267 words]RobertOct 4, 2022 13:26287121
2Burqa clad women tend to become obese or over-weight [236 words]PrashantOct 5, 2022 00:45287121
2The tale of two Muslim women in India [360 words]PrashantOct 12, 2022 13:32287121
2India & Pakistan - Hindu & Islam [303 words]RobertOct 12, 2022 22:14287121
3Evidence behind my conjecture and more [264 words]PrashantOct 16, 2022 00:20287121
2Banning the burqa and niqab - how to get it done [281 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
NicholasMay 13, 2022 20:49281163
more dangerous aspects of Islamism in the USA [148 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
DavidMay 13, 2022 19:28281158
2Head Covers and body tent like covers [106 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
joan ribiApr 28, 2022 15:51280269
1Pallywood: This is how the Palestinian method of fraud works [63 words]EmirApr 25, 2022 03:46280072
1How to know that a video is real? [117 words]PrashantApr 25, 2022 18:11280072
1Agree Totally with Cohen-Almagor's Logic, Pipes' Conclusion Except It Isn't Enough [591 words]David RyanApr 24, 2022 05:57280043
2Weak arguments, lost battle, wrong strategy [401 words]DavidApr 26, 2022 03:54280043
4Screening for "Radical" Muslims [343 words]David RyanApr 26, 2022 13:20280043
2Obfuscation of Intents and Purposes - Implementing Dress Codes Does Not Deal with Heart of the Matter [153 words]M ToveyApr 26, 2022 18:00280043
4Saluting David Horowitz [145 words]PrashantApr 27, 2022 01:29280043
2Re. your column on "The Case For Banning Burqas and Niqas [299 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Bryan TaplitsApr 23, 2022 18:44280026
3Why increase the risks to public health and safety? [78 words]DaveApr 23, 2022 16:55280024

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)