69 million page views

Obfuscation of Intents and Purposes - Implementing Dress Codes Does Not Deal with Heart of the Matter

Reader comment on item: The Case for Banning Burqas and Niqabs
in response to reader comment: Weak arguments, lost battle, wrong strategy

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Apr 26, 2022 at 18:00

So, face it: if one was not brought up in in an enviroment where the unfamiliarity of the specified dress code would cause one to question its validity, how would that be different than, say, the era of the Gibson girl or the Victorian age of demonstrable code of womens wear? Hiding the womenfolk became synonymus with hiding that which one cannot control. Does that equate with Islam's apparent inability to function in a modern environment without resorting to tactics that are meant to obfuscate the issues they were not able to control even when the Ottoman empire was the modern face of Muslim apologetics in a world that was shedding religious inhibitions? In this world where apostate religion of all sectors is running amok, In the final analysis, it is no longer about preserving the code of modesty, but it is more about maintaining control of that which one desires to conquer.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (17) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
3Iran's Women's Fashion Revolution? [267 words]RobertOct 4, 2022 13:26287121
2Burqa clad women tend to become obese or over-weight [236 words]PrashantOct 5, 2022 00:45287121
2The tale of two Muslim women in India [360 words]PrashantOct 12, 2022 13:32287121
2India & Pakistan - Hindu & Islam [303 words]RobertOct 12, 2022 22:14287121
3Evidence behind my conjecture and more [264 words]PrashantOct 16, 2022 00:20287121
2Banning the burqa and niqab - how to get it done [281 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
NicholasMay 13, 2022 20:49281163
more dangerous aspects of Islamism in the USA [148 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
DavidMay 13, 2022 19:28281158
2Head Covers and body tent like covers [106 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
joan ribiApr 28, 2022 15:51280269
1Pallywood: This is how the Palestinian method of fraud works [63 words]EmirApr 25, 2022 03:46280072
1How to know that a video is real? [117 words]PrashantApr 25, 2022 18:11280072
1Agree Totally with Cohen-Almagor's Logic, Pipes' Conclusion Except It Isn't Enough [591 words]David RyanApr 24, 2022 05:57280043
2Weak arguments, lost battle, wrong strategy [401 words]DavidApr 26, 2022 03:54280043
4Screening for "Radical" Muslims [343 words]David RyanApr 26, 2022 13:20280043
2Obfuscation of Intents and Purposes - Implementing Dress Codes Does Not Deal with Heart of the Matter [153 words]M ToveyApr 26, 2022 18:00280043
4Saluting David Horowitz [145 words]PrashantApr 27, 2022 01:29280043
2Re. your column on "The Case For Banning Burqas and Niqas [299 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Bryan TaplitsApr 23, 2022 18:44280026
3Why increase the risks to public health and safety? [78 words]DaveApr 23, 2022 16:55280024

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)