69 million page views

No Solace in Reviewing Failure of American Political Process's Current Inabilities to Protect Freedom

Reader comment on item: Trump's Need to Concede
in response to reader comment: You're January 7, 2020, update I did see.

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Feb 22, 2022 at 20:38

From this observer's perspective, attempting in commiseration to find solace that recovery from two years worth of politcal worthlessness is nowhere near presenting any solutions that life in America can retrieve any sense of what is now apparently lost for the foreseable future and terms of any such recovery are still indescribable.
2022 is still not guaranteed to accomplish any transition to political or practical re-establishment of pursuits of freedom; for one very real practical reason: nobody agrees on how to to that. President Trump tried, but had limited help. That is all but gone now and retrieveing that is not what the progressive democratic agenda is about.
There is your January 6, 2022 memorandum of accomplishment as we are now in a state of attempting being kept out of the Eurasian theater of war.
Does anyone think President Trump could have handled this differently?

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to No Solace in Reviewing Failure of American Political Process's Current Inabilities to Protect Freedom by M Tovey

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)