The True Differences Between Chief Executive No. 44 Vs No. 45

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Apr 11, 2017 at 14:15

Seriously, if there was ever a place that would NOT understand how an American president could retrieve some semblance of order out of the lack of order from the previous administration, Romania may not top the list, but being in the top 25 is not a hard assumption to make.
Instead of worrying about how the United States as being characterized as some sort of aggressor, consider again how the Kriim is again the launching point of the Russian attempt on monopolizing world credited power in Soviet style forays in regions they have longed for since Czar Pyotr.
President Trump is not functioning as Caliph in any kind of successorship to former Chief Executive #44; and for good reason: they are categorically opposed to the means by which America was formed in history. Only if one is mesmerized by the leftist elitist agenda of the progressive ideology that hates President Trump for pulling the rug from under their self-delusional desires to obtain his presidential power again does one think as this Romanian espouses - they have no clue.
As one who is willing to give President Trump the benefit of the doubt, I'll wait to judge the results, not the opinions of those who do not know what it truly means to be a real American President.
After all, Chief Executive #44 was the one whose espoused pro-Muslim sentiments, not # 45.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".