69 million page views

No "Partial"

Reader comment on item: The Danger of Partial No-go Zones to Europe

Submitted by Ephraim Lior (United States), Dec 30, 2015 at 00:51

I do not see why would you want to reduce the widely adopted name "NO GO ZONE" by adding the word "PARTIAL". While your tendency for scientific precision could be understood, your pointing to the fact that some people can actually go in does not hold water.

1. The relative inaccuracy of the term NO GO is apparent as some people (Muslims) DO indeed GO into these zones unlike the real NO GO territories contaminated by radioactive mishaps (Chernobyl, Fokushima). This would cancel the need for extra accuracy as these zone would be PARTIAL NO GO even if Muslims only rule was strictly enforces.

2. You have created three groups of people for frivolously deciding whether these zones are PARTIAL or not:
a) - State representatives, b) - Muslims, c) - All others.

Then you decided that if groups a) and c) are excluded then it would be NO GO;
if only group a) is excluded then it's PARTIAL.

This makes your label PARTIAL very subjective. And also you didn't mention here (but did in your earlier piece of 12/2/15) one detail which divides the group c) into two subgroups: plane civilians who in most cases could pass for Muslims, and those who stick out (people wearing a priest's habit, skimpy clothing, or with a kippa, and other unmistaken signes of non-Muslim identity). The fact that the latter subgroup is also unwelcomed into NGZ weakens your label PARTIAL even further.

WIth all respect to your strive for academic accuracy, I wouldn't give to the less scrupulous people one more argument that these zones are not per se NO GO ZONES, referring to D.Pipes' label PARTIAL.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Reader comments (23) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Après nous, le déluge [62 words]Jp.Y.Jan 28, 2016 12:48227839
1too subtle [76 words]y Brandstetter MDDec 31, 2015 10:33227389
2Dismantle Psychopathic Islam Everywhere [419 words]Domenic PepeDec 31, 2015 04:14227386
3To Domenic Pepe [38 words]dfdJan 1, 2016 10:58227386
1Molenbeek and East St. Louis not as different as you suggest [470 words]Dan SimonDec 31, 2015 00:23227379
2Stop Muslim Immigration [47 words]BillDec 30, 2015 09:25227366
police lets islamists patrol The Hague during New Year's Eve [758 words]mythDec 30, 2015 08:58227365
No "Partial" [275 words]Ephraim LiorDec 30, 2015 00:51227358
"No-go-zones in Europe " or anywhere. [133 words]Vishu MenonDec 29, 2015 21:03227356
1Can't do this without confronting Islam, and Mohammed? [157 words]Ron ThompsonDec 29, 2015 15:57227352
historical comparisons [112 words]Alan WhiteJan 4, 2016 21:51227352
2The dangers of 'No Go' zones are the same as... [125 words]Doug MayfieldDec 29, 2015 15:31227351
1The West has a Superman, But He's Still Playing Clark Kent [235 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
TL WinslowDec 29, 2015 13:09227350
3The Current Peace Plan: Turn The West Bank Into A No-Go Zone [193 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
DaveDec 29, 2015 12:52227348
Loss Of Access [73 words]DaveDec 30, 2015 12:10227348
The will to survive [103 words]Steven ShermanDec 29, 2015 03:39227338
2Ah, the 1950s ! [135 words]C. Paul BarreiraDec 29, 2015 01:41227337
Who is guilty? [64 words]steven LDec 29, 2015 01:14227336
1Once Musliom Muslim forever? [38 words]Janusz KowalikDec 29, 2015 00:44227333
Wider applicability [91 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Harvey LithwickDec 29, 2015 00:09227331
Israel does have no-go zones [30 words]MikeDec 30, 2015 07:55227331
No Go Zones in Israel [49 words]Harvey LithwickJan 1, 2016 02:01227331
4North America will be a lot worse than Europe [221 words]Michael Hanni MorcosDec 28, 2015 23:53227330

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)