69 million page views

A Critque of the criticisms

Reader comment on item: Criticisms of the U.S.-led Air Campaign against ISIS

Submitted by Cyril Chilson (United Kingdom), Sep 28, 2014 at 18:54

Dear Daniel,

Why do I get the impression that your criticisms reflect above all a Republican anxiety ? Now , that it has transpired that President Obama is showing signs not only of temperance and patience (which the belligerent Repblicans always liked to present as 'liberal weackness') - but also of determination and ability to assume the role of C-in-C when really necessary - the Republicans are panic striken . Their thunder is about to be stolen. You should have hipped praises on your country's campaign against ISIL - instead of these partisanship-motivated criticisms.

Let's deal with your points one by one:

1 Iran is not quite there as yet. Scaremongering is futile and indeed counter-productive.

2. Leaving Iran to its own devices is a huge mistake. Don't forget: Russia is next door and will be more than delighted to get closer to Teheran if the West turns its back on Iran. You don't want that - do you?

3 Pipes iron rule is far from being the rule of the thumb. No sound statesman let alone military commander should make any statements about his or her operation plans for the foreseeable future at the hight of an international military crisis. Espcially when keeping the regional coalition together is, as we all know, ןד a very tricky business and requires diplomatic adroitness. Yes, Israel might feel the odd one out but they will get over it - as indeed they did during the First Gulf War, Where does your allegiance lie anyway?

4 Moderate opponents to Assad do exist. Both Iran and Israel are not terribly happy about this. Surely you wish to minimise the influencial role of Iran in Syria. It follows that even Israel may profit from this. Ah... the Israelies are trying to perish any thoughts about a revival of the peace negotiations with Syria. They are determined to keep the Golan heights at any cost, don't they

5 "Destroying oil production facilities is almost always a mistake." From the point of view of an oil industry big shot. Not to worry. War can be a good opportunity to make good money through government contracts. Think 'Halliburton'.

5 Why? Are you a leftist or something?

Yours truly,

Cyril Cihlson

Oxford UK

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (31) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Atrocious Islamic "Palestinian" Har-Nof synagogue massacre (18.11.14) [204 words]MalkaJun 30, 2022 00:24282878
The Problem Is Islamic Terrorism [88 words]Tom DundeeOct 27, 2014 09:19218989
no boots policy meant to motivate [39 words]JebBSep 30, 2014 17:35218349
Response to no boots on the ground [59 words]Stephen H. ChopekOct 2, 2014 14:32218349
Airstrikes alone wont do the job ! [49 words]Stephen H. ChopekSep 29, 2014 18:37218311
The Initial Strategy [80 words]Barry BlackOct 1, 2014 10:01218311
1Footmote in history? I don't think so... [120 words]saraOct 1, 2014 21:16218311
A Brave New World? [64 words]Barry BlackOct 2, 2014 11:03218311
2Again, I disagree with your definition ... [206 words]saraOct 2, 2014 21:35218311
2Obama's pro-Iran sympathies [193 words]Dean M.Sep 29, 2014 16:44218309
Ad hominem attacks have no place on a Daniel Pipes blog [76 words]RAYMOND TANTERSep 30, 2014 22:19218309
Keeping the eye on the ball: Iran [116 words]Dean MOct 1, 2014 22:29218309
Saudi oilfields [36 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
ECAWSep 29, 2014 13:28218307
Saudi oilfieds [43 words]ECAWOct 2, 2014 02:31218307
1there is an option [82 words]servet cevikSep 29, 2014 02:14218302
Criticisms of the U.S.-led Air Campaign against ISIS [63 words]Tony WilsonSep 28, 2014 19:02218292
All about jobs [158 words]MIchael S.Oct 5, 2014 09:08218292
A Critque of the criticisms [374 words]Cyril ChilsonSep 28, 2014 18:54218291
Peacw [16 words]An ordinary womanJun 13, 2016 15:58218291
1The Kurdish factor: Russian tanks via Iran could be a game-changer. [170 words]Michael S.Sep 28, 2014 18:51218290
the US should act like a super power [359 words]mythSep 28, 2014 18:30218289
destroying oil production is now certainly a mistake [29 words]mythSep 28, 2014 17:47218287
U.S.and Isis. [18 words]JanaSep 28, 2014 17:35218286
LET THE ARABS FIGHT THE ARABS [262 words]Ilene RichmanSep 28, 2014 17:17218284
The Obligation of American Exceptionalism. [208 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
EthanPSep 28, 2014 16:32218282
ISIS Beheadings Unhinge People [73 words]DaveSep 28, 2014 16:31218280
Search for moderates [27 words]Ann Luppi von MehrenSep 28, 2014 13:56218276
Assad's dictatorship not really the problem [82 words]Michael S.Sep 30, 2014 20:43218276
Cannot Dismiss Syria Altogether - With or Without al-Assad [577 words]M. ToveyOct 3, 2014 16:01218276
1Turkey's next steps in Syria and elsewhere [677 words]Michael SOct 10, 2014 17:06218276
Great analysis [30 words]saraOct 10, 2014 21:03218276

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to A Critque of the criticisms by Cyril Chilson

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)