69 million page views

Turkey's next steps in Syria and elsewhere

Reader comment on item: Criticisms of the U.S.-led Air Campaign against ISIS
in response to reader comment: Cannot Dismiss Syria Altogether - With or Without al-Assad

Submitted by Michael S (United States), Oct 10, 2014 at 17:06

Hi, Tovey. You said,

"the distinction of al-Assad's being it is the most resilient, a peculiarity that has many stumped, especially the current American Administrative Chief Executive; or so we are led to believe."

We double-crossed the Russians in Libya: getting a Russia-approved UN resolution to intervene for humanitarian purposes only, and promising not to push for a regime change. We pushed for a regime change, had Gaddafi lynched; and because the Russians did not have sufficient air and naval power in play to stop us, we got away with it. When it came to Syria's turn, Assad saw that his only real choices were to resist or end up like Gaddafi, so he understandably resisted. Obama should certainly have understood this; but maybe he felt so invincible, that what Assad did wouldn't make any difference. The Russians sent ships and weapons to him full-tilt; because once they understood that he would stick it out, they knew they had to go with him in order to maintain their only naval base in the Mediterranean -- and their only hope to not be humiliated again by the Americans, Libya-style.

"Syria will never be the same, whether the current regime remains or not."

Emphatically so. I expect Syria and Iraq to both be partitioned by the Turks and Iranians.

"...which make empire building more difficult these days is that arms sales knows no allegiance except the prevailing currency exchange rate and more bang for the buck."

Actually, arms sales only fuel empire-building. If a competitor like Russia comes up with a new, advanced system, then Congress will almost certainly give General Dynamics, Lockeed-Martin or Boeing a multi-million/-billion $$ contract to counter it. This creates American jobs and strengthens our economy; and since we are the world's reserve currency, we can always afford it.

"and who remains to fill that vacuum – Erdoǧan? Hmmmm."

...or his successor. He's an excellent fit for the job, though.

"The question for the moment: do we or do we not intentionally or unintentionally assist al-Assad; and what do we do when that fails without a plan B?"

Kobane pretty much tells the story. Erdogan is purposely and visibly standing by, literally watching ISIL destroy his enemies the Kurds. The US, meanwhile, is demonstrating its inability to stop this. Erdogan knows that the Kobane massacre will (and already has) trigger a re-awakening of the Kurdish rebellion in Turkey. He plans to mercilessly crush this; and the world (i.e. the US) will not be able to stop him (Turkey is, after all, a NATO ally; and the Americans themselves have labeled the Turkish Kurds as "terrorists"). Once ISIL has utterly destroyed the Syrian Kurds, Erdogan can move in with his nearly 4,000 German- and American-built main battle tanks and over 400 fighter aircraft against Assad's vastly inferior military, all in the name of "fighting terrorism" for the West.

We will not assist Assad. Obama has made that clear. Iran, on the other hand, has vowed to continue supporting him. Iran wants an accessible front with Israel. It can have this, by continuing to hold Syria and Lebanon, and cutting a deal with Turkey to allow a supply corridor via Iraq. Kurdistan and Iraq (Shi'ite) will probably be Iranian vassals by then, and Turkey will occupy Sunni-Arab Iraq.

The above practically begs to come into being. What then? The money is on Iran using its Syrian and Hizbullah proxies to attack Israel, forcing Israel to retalliate by occupying Lebanon and Syria-Damascus. Turkey will then directly face Israel, with Iran as a new-found ally against it; and Ezekiel 38-39 will be set up. This is close to a re-play of the old Israel-Aram-Assyria days during the reign of Pekah. Damascus was destroyed in 734, and Samaria in 721.

"what does the world expect to happen then?"

I expect they will be too busy buying and selling, marrying and giving in marriage (men with men, and women with women) to even notice. If Rome is an example, moreover, they will be engrossed in sports, eating and a welfare state.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (31) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Atrocious Islamic "Palestinian" Har-Nof synagogue massacre (18.11.14) [204 words]MalkaJun 30, 2022 00:24282878
The Problem Is Islamic Terrorism [88 words]Tom DundeeOct 27, 2014 09:19218989
no boots policy meant to motivate [39 words]JebBSep 30, 2014 17:35218349
Response to no boots on the ground [59 words]Stephen H. ChopekOct 2, 2014 14:32218349
Airstrikes alone wont do the job ! [49 words]Stephen H. ChopekSep 29, 2014 18:37218311
The Initial Strategy [80 words]Barry BlackOct 1, 2014 10:01218311
1Footmote in history? I don't think so... [120 words]saraOct 1, 2014 21:16218311
A Brave New World? [64 words]Barry BlackOct 2, 2014 11:03218311
2Again, I disagree with your definition ... [206 words]saraOct 2, 2014 21:35218311
2Obama's pro-Iran sympathies [193 words]Dean M.Sep 29, 2014 16:44218309
Ad hominem attacks have no place on a Daniel Pipes blog [76 words]RAYMOND TANTERSep 30, 2014 22:19218309
Keeping the eye on the ball: Iran [116 words]Dean MOct 1, 2014 22:29218309
Saudi oilfields [36 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
ECAWSep 29, 2014 13:28218307
Saudi oilfieds [43 words]ECAWOct 2, 2014 02:31218307
1there is an option [82 words]servet cevikSep 29, 2014 02:14218302
Criticisms of the U.S.-led Air Campaign against ISIS [63 words]Tony WilsonSep 28, 2014 19:02218292
All about jobs [158 words]MIchael S.Oct 5, 2014 09:08218292
A Critque of the criticisms [374 words]Cyril ChilsonSep 28, 2014 18:54218291
Peacw [16 words]An ordinary womanJun 13, 2016 15:58218291
1The Kurdish factor: Russian tanks via Iran could be a game-changer. [170 words]Michael S.Sep 28, 2014 18:51218290
the US should act like a super power [359 words]mythSep 28, 2014 18:30218289
destroying oil production is now certainly a mistake [29 words]mythSep 28, 2014 17:47218287
U.S.and Isis. [18 words]JanaSep 28, 2014 17:35218286
LET THE ARABS FIGHT THE ARABS [262 words]Ilene RichmanSep 28, 2014 17:17218284
The Obligation of American Exceptionalism. [208 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
EthanPSep 28, 2014 16:32218282
ISIS Beheadings Unhinge People [73 words]DaveSep 28, 2014 16:31218280
Search for moderates [27 words]Ann Luppi von MehrenSep 28, 2014 13:56218276
Assad's dictatorship not really the problem [82 words]Michael S.Sep 30, 2014 20:43218276
Cannot Dismiss Syria Altogether - With or Without al-Assad [577 words]M. ToveyOct 3, 2014 16:01218276
1Turkey's next steps in Syria and elsewhere [677 words]Michael SOct 10, 2014 17:06218276
Great analysis [30 words]saraOct 10, 2014 21:03218276

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Turkey's next steps in Syria and elsewhere by Michael S

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)