69 million page views

Validity of Islamic Literary Sources

Reader comment on item: Islam's Inadvertent Patterns
in response to reader comment: Understanding Zaat-e-Muhammad

Submitted by Dawudi (India), Aug 26, 2014 at 14:11

Actually, I am interested in knowing about not only about validity of "Literary Sources" but way by which Muhmmad transmitted his ideology despite of big forgery in Islamic History. Your arguments about Ali as not part of chain of succession following first three KHALIF, if hold true who are these AL KHULFA AL RASHIDUN ? and Dhimmi no more ,I don't consider arguments or speculations of anyone are of no value ! Here on this forum everyone can argue by his logic .If logic fails ,argument will false.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)