4 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Dear Mr. Tom

Reader comment on item: The Silver Lining of Obama's Weak America
in response to reader comment: The Shah's Failings

Submitted by Debanjan Banerjee (Australia), Nov 28, 2013 at 22:19

The Shah denied the people of Iran the freedom to practice their Shia beliefs as they thought they should.

My Answer : On the contrary. In fact the Shia clergy were firmly behind the Shah of Iran throughout the time period.

The Shah had allowed women to leave their homes, dress like Western women, and hold jobs.

My Answer : He did not. Shah was a conservative Muslim ruler by all accounts. Throughout his reign most people could not even afford to eat regularly and do you think they would be able to provide education for their girls ?

I believe women held most of the professional jobs and that was intolerable in the minds of the Mad Mollos.

My Answer : What is the source of your beliefs ? Can you please tell me ? As I have mentioned most of the Shia clergy was on the side of Shah throughout his reign. The Islamic revolution had nothing to do with Shia but eveyrhting to do with the economic issues.

You need to figure out what kind of world you want. Upon independence

My Answer : Same goes for the USA. Upon independence , the Founding Fathers decided to keep their slaves , contiuued to slaughter the native Americans and keep the Women as tools for producng babies. In fact not before the industrial revolution in the early 20-th century , women in the US did get the vote. The Iranian revolutionaries straightway offered women voting rights and free education that is why Iran produces more female graduates than male graduates.

So I believe compared to the American revolution , Islamic revolution was an astounding success story.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Dear Mr. Tom by Debanjan Banerjee

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2021 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)